That stock News

Wednesday, George Osborne has confirmed plans to replace all the advantages of working age and credits with a universal single, simple tax credit"photo: GETTY

Reductions in tax credits "will reduce the work incentive", reforms of benefit directly from "against the ideas behind the universal credit" tax board and the abduction of children benefit from high earners of page is "not one well-designed means test", said the IFS.

The reflection group also met contested claim of Chancellor of the that "those who have broad shoulders should bear the greatest burden", arguing that the combined effect of the 110bn ￡ spending cuts and regressive tax - increases hitting the poor than the rich.

In addition, IFS said Mr. Osborne on schools pledge that "we will ensure cash per pupil funding does not fall" pointing out that, after inflation, "total expenditure per pupil school be reduced to 0 6pc per year" by 2015.

Centre for social reform coalition is expected to make it "work pay". But Mike Brewer, Director program, IFS has stated that, as a result of the tax credit changes "on the whole, the families poorer children gain and some working families with children lose... it will reduce the incentive to work."

It is also essential changes in benefits of tax board from responsibility for discounts to local authorities and save 500 m ￡ per year.By splitting a single benefit policy "goes against the ideas behind the universal credit", said Mr. Brewer.

On Wednesday, the Chancellor has confirmed plans "to replace all the benefits of age working and credits with a universal single, simple tax credit.A spokesman said that welfare changes are likely to be redesigned once again, saying: "the Government will carry out intensive work on the universal credit."

Mr. Brewer also stressed that the Government expects to lose approximately 280 m ￡ changes to child benefits, potential income is going to raise ￡ 2 5bn but struck mothers at home, through "tax planning".

Sources of the Treasury Board bridled hardest central claim of the IFS as the plan of consolidation for a total of ￡ 110bn strike most pauvres.Carl Emmerson, acting Director of the IFS, said: "our analysis shows that, with the exception of the richest 2pc, tax components and benefits of budgetary consolidation are applied in a regressive manner."

A spokesman for the Board insisted that the analysis of the IFS was not complete because it does not address the dépenses.Cependant reductions, the analysis of the Treasury Board suggests that are also régressives.Le spokesman said: "the 20pc richest take the largest share of the burden of when we take into account all of the consolidation measures."

View the original article here