That stock News

Last week the determined U.K. scientists who came first: the chicken or the egg? They claim that it was the chicken. But Wall Street version is coming from first sale or job is still open. Consumers don't want to go because they feel comfortable in the future, more precisely in the economy and their work; companies expand - add plants, spending for capital expenditures, to hire workers (full or part-time, same extension hours) until such time as their sales pick up. From the company point of view, why invest to produce more, when you are not selling even everything that you do today, especially if their incomes are well (don't forget that they have more cash side then at any time in history). On the side of consumers, even those who feel secure with their job watch their bottom line money is tight (and gaze even your retirement fund or benefits). Then how you break the downward cycle of I spend so "I will build?" First of all there was to break stimulus programs. But we later trillion and unemployed. Perhaps it could have been worse, perhaps, we simply more stimuli or maybe we'll just supply a junkie. Choose a theory, standing wide and Wall and he preach. But everything we are everywhere where we are in the process he has not even worked, and the Americans are not known for their patience. So if we start to see some real improvements soon tie goes to the low side and time is not on our side. I wait for execution of a household only a person on the basis would nice - something in the root.
Comment above mine is course and does not make part of my review of earnings below, but the two do not appear to be mixing. maybe I need to take back and find bias in my report, or perhaps an increase of 38% of remuneration is not history.
Yesterday evening we had 24.9% of reported Q2 earnings. So far, earnings for the 2nd quarter 2010 results are encouraging at first. Based on the questions actually reported earnings are 14.5% ahead of estimates with 65.8% of the questions beating their estimates. Sales, however, are another story.While 73.4% of the questions have beaten their sales estimate, "pace" is only slight, with the entry of aggregate sales associate of 4.4 per cent ahead of estimates - much less than 14.5% of the growth in Q2 2009 gain rémunération.La last year is also impressive, with 38.4% to come (except Citigroup having a mass of last year's loss) earnings, but sales are a disappointing 6.7% to come. Anyway you cut - sales just aren't cutting it.
I believe that comparisons should concentrate on the results of the quarter-on-quarter to determine progress of recovery, as well as the underlying dynamics of the economy. And since I believe that jobs are number one, and that companies are generally serviceable financial with excess money, so that they can climb at any short term interruption, I expect as an indicator of future sales.On this basis, the earnings are running ahead of first quarter 2010, but sales are flat, and it is the problem.Its large companies improve incomes, but these improvements are due to high margins that are cost - reductions specifically reductions in labour, product the same thing that we need to improve now.Until businesses and consumers are starting to spend more, not heal the employment front, but they spend more until they believe that things are mieux.Le stimulus programs were suppose that pass start economy and break the cycle down in convincing both groups that best times were ici.Mais at the moment we are not witnessing the sales or employment; but the gains are good, at least for the moment.
]]>
View the original article here