Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

How the new Congress could affect stocks in 2011 (AP)

By DAVID K. RANDALL, AP Business Writer David K. Randall, Ap Business Writer – 50?mins?ago

NEW YORK – Next year will be a year unlike any other for the stock market.

The Republican takeover of the House of Representatives on Tuesday means Wall Street will be contending with three situations in 2011 that drive stock prices:

? The year before a president faces re-election.

? The year after a president has lost control of Congress.

? The second year of a fragile economic expansion.

The market often behaves a certain way in each of those situations, but history isn't helpful now because investors have never faced this trifecta before. What's clear is that what happens in Washington will be watched even more closely by investors next year.

"This election is more important than the average one because of all of the economic and policy issues that remain uncertain," says Robert Doll, the chief investment strategist at BlackRock, an investing firm with $3.4 trillion in assets under management.

Any mishandling of the economy by politicians will mean that "the fragile economic recovery we have is going to be hit over the head, and we would have to think about a double-dip recession all over again," Doll says.

Here's a look at the three situations coinciding next year and how they could affect the stock market:

_THE YEAR BEFORE A PRESIDENT RUNS FOR ELECTION:

Since 1945, the Dow Jones industrial average has gained an average of 19 percent the year before a sitting president runs. That's more than double the 7.9 percent average annual gain during the same period. If you take out the 10 years when the president was running, the average gain drops to only 5.8 percent.

No one has been able to prove why this happens. One theory is that the president pushes through politically popular spending measures to help his re-election. But that doesn't explain why the market also tends to rise in the third year of a president's second term. The Dow rose 25.2 percent, for example, in 1999, the third year of President Clinton's second term. Since 1902 the Dow has gained, on average, 13.7 percent in the third year of a president's first term and 10.9 percent in the third year of a president's second term.

_THE YEAR AFTER A PRESIDENT LOSES CONTROL OF CONGRESS

Presidents whose party controlled both houses of Congress have lost at least one chamber five times in the past 80 years. Stock returns in the following year haven't followed a pattern. The Dow plunged 53 percent in 1931 and gained 34 percent in 1995. Gains in the other three years ranged from 2.2 percent to 20.8 percent. That makes it impossible to forecast what will happen this time. The change in Congress in 1931 came during the Great Depression, while the 1995 transition came during the first part of the Internet boom. The next Congress faces a fragile economic period, which could mean that the market offers another single-digit gain like this year.

Gridlock hasn't been great for stocks. Since 1945, the Standard and Poor's 500 index has gained 4 percent in years when Congress was split between parties. It increased 8 percent when Congress was controlled by one party and the White House another. When a single party was in control of Washington, the index gained an average of 11 percent.

_SLOW-GROWING ECONOMY

The economy is growing at a 2 percent annual rate, according to the latest estimate by the Commerce Department. That's slow by historical standards and shows that the end of the recession 17 months ago hasn't translated into a robust economic expansion.

Stocks have been in a bull market for 18 months, pushing the Dow up 70 percent since it hit a 12-year low in March 2009. That gain is larger than normal but isn't surprising considering that the rally followed the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. During slow recoveries like this one, bull markets typically last 30 months and bring gains of 44 percent overall, according to Ned Davis Research.

Corporate profits are improving, and wealthy consumers are starting to make some costly purchases. If the economy continues to improve, stocks will likely rise. But don't expect large gains because the economy needs to grow 3 percent or more to bring down the country's 9.6 percent unemployment rate. That's unlikely soon because residential and commercial construction remains weak, and construction fuels economic recoveries.

So what's an investor to do given this abnormal year? The best thing may be to follow your long-term plans regardless of what happens in Washington.

"There's no way to tell what's going to happen, or we would all be rich," says Paul Larson, the chief equities strategist at Morningstar.

(This version corrects typos in 9th and 13th paragraphs)


View the original article here

New Congress faces difficult economic choices

Now, Republicans have control of the House and were carved by far to majority of Democrats in the Senate. What they probably have control is the market badly broken housing, high unemployment and the runaway Government spending.

Promises of politicians side, these problems will be much more that a change in the nameplates Congrès.Et gridlock in Washington, D.c. offices is likely to solve the economic problems of the nation even more difficult.

"Democrats had very badly to get laws passed, even with the strong majority they had, said Sam Stovall, investment Chief Strategist to standard & Poor."I think that the Republicans will do better with only a very slight majority in the House and no majority at the Senate.?

History: Divided Congress tap GOP enters the House

Republican leader John Boehner House promised to work to reduce health care administration from the Ohio Republican Obama.Le reform Wednesday is online to replace the California Democrat Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House.

"I think it is important for us to lay the Foundation until we begin to repeal this monstrosity and replace it sense reforms that bring the cost of healthcare in America,"Boehner told reporters.""

Some House Republicans have also promised to seek changes in the scan for financial regulatory reform package know as Dodd-Frank.Spencer Bachus, R, Ala, which is defined to replace the Democrat Masschusetts Rep as the House financial services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said that effort would mean targeting "job-killing provisions" of the Act.

"We will take additional steps knowing that we must have the bipartite agreement in the Senate," he told CNBC.

That control of House to a new image group heads movements, Congress faces a familiar set of economic issues: housing, employment and the budget deficit.

Housing
Now in its fourth year of falling prices and increased seizures continued to weigh on growth économique.Trois ill housing market separate federal programs tried and failed to overturn the on saisies.élections Tuesday, and is not likely to change this.

Temporary fix Life.: are companies such as Caterpillar bounce, but their employment to full-time workers is pas.Vie Inc.: the target on the target return adversity index: economy crawling on the floor Life.: Economist says "no double-dip".

"There was no magic solution ball federally to correct in the housing market" said Jared Seiberg, the global search for Washington's FM group policy analyst financial services."This is true if the Republicans have right of veto-proof majorities in the House or Senate or démocrates.Si Obama administration could have done that in the course of the past two years, there."

Neither party has understood how slow the rate of foreclosures, keep more families in their homes or provide relief for the holders of mortgage on four "under water" owing more than their control of Congress valent.Fractionnement houses make easier fix deficit giant mortgage Government-controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.Si anything, the debate could become more polarized.

"You're going to do on the side of the House Subcommittee chairs who questioned whether the Government should play the role it played in the past for the last generations of many in the market for mortgage loans," said Seiberg.

Information recent lenders could have cut corners in their efforts to lock owners have prompted an investigation conducted by all 50 State General Counsel.This effort is currently headed by Tom Miller of Iowa, who won a difficult reelection fight Tuesday.

Taxes and expenses
Voters who demanded change in Washington will be significant in the direction of the House, change as key committees control moves to the Group of images. Republicans promised major changes in policy related to tax and spending.

A change in key leadership will be Rep Paul Ryan, R - Wisconsin, responsible for the House Budget Committee, which provides tax revenue estimates and expenditure targets.A vocal opponent of record federal budget deficits, Ryan has proposed "a Roadmap for America's future" as deep reductions in expenditure.

Republicans would also control the Commission credit House, where they have promised to save $ 100 billion next year by reducing spending in 2008, with the exception of programs for the elderly, US troops and Republican California combattants.Classement levels Jerry Lewis, who chaired the Committee for the administration of George w. Bush should an exemption from heads of GOP recover travail.Ensuite online term limits would be Rep Harold Rogers, r.-KY., which has been lobbying for Labour Party colleagues.

Jobs
Expenditure reductions would probably steeper cuts in government payroll shrinks as the impact of federal stimulus program has begun to fade .Since peaking in April 2009, a Government 450 000 net jobs have been éliminés.Ces payroll should continue to shrink that States strive to fill the gaps in multi-billion dollar budget.

Some business leaders expressed their reluctance to hire workers more until economic prospects improve - and they get more clarity on tax policies and the cost of care santé.Dave camp, reform - Michigan, is online at the Presidency of tax-law-writing Chamber tracks and moyens.Camp is among those Republicans are committed to reduce taxes to stimulate job creation.

Although some economists have argued that a new round of stimulus spending is necessary to create jobs, this idea faces already strong resistance from the two parties.Rep Darrell Issa, R-in California, which is online to take control of the House Oversight and government reform Comimttee, has promised to examine the efficacy of 814 billion stimulus program administration Obama.

Tuesday, Issa said reporters will work for government inspectors general subpoena power and start a Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac survey.

Update there are 2 minutes 11/3/2010 5: 24: 46 PM + 00: 00 Obama after GOP win: "I have to do a better job" analysis: "Hurricane" inflicts Democrats in bruising race California Brown won the work of the Governor Ricky Martin: fear I held out Boehner: we must listen to the people

Some have argued that by the Congress of restraint, deadlock may be a good chose.Mais argument is easier when the economy is on track, said Ron Carson investment advisor.

"Today things are broken", he said. "We need today is decisive leadership and action .and you're not going to get with the deadlock.

? 2010 reprints of msnbc.com


View the original article here

Powered by Blogger