Showing posts with label World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World. Show all posts

World stocks tick higher (Reuters)

LONDON (Reuters) – World stocks edged higher on Friday as investors grew more confident about the prospect for economic recovery following robust U.S. and Chinese data while Treasuries stabilized after a sell-off earlier this week.

Friday's data showed China's imports and exports were much stronger than expected in November, robust numbers that served a reminder that Chinese demand was still growing apace and could pave the way for an interest rate rise as soon as this weekend.

Recent figures suggest the United States and stronger European economies are also picking up steam.

"The Chinese numbers and the performance of the U.S. overnight justify a higher start," Heino Ruland, strategist at Ruland Research in Frankfurt, said.

On Wall Street on Thursday, the benchmark S&P 500 index (.SPX) hit a two-year high with data showing first-time claims for jobless benefits fell more than expected last week.

MSCI world equity index (.MIWD00000PUS) rose 0.1 percent while the FTSEurofirst 300 index (.FTEU3) gained the same amount.

TREASURIES RECOVER

U.S. Treasuries edged up thanks to a strong auction of 30-year bonds that reflected investor appetite. Treasuries sold off heavily earlier in the week on U.S. President Barack Obama's plans to extend low tax rates. However, those plans hit some opposition ahead of a Senate vote next week.

Rising U.S. Treasury yields this week and growing inflation concerns in developing economies -- together with the prospect of tighter Chinese policy -- also encouraged investors to scale back their already overstretched bets on emerging markets.

Emerging stocks (.MSCIEF) lost 0.2 percent, partly on concerns about China's possible measures to tighten the economy.

"Data all suggest that further policy normalization is needed to keep China's economy on an even keel. So far, China has made only modest moves in this direction," RBC said in a note to clients.

"We expect to see more urgency from Beijing in the months ahead as tackling inflation becomes a greater priority, with both rate hikes and currency appreciation likely to be employed."

Ten-year Treasuries were up 8/32 in price to yield 3.185 percent, off a six-month high of 3.330 percent reached on Wednesday.

The sale of $13 billion of reopened 30-year U.S. bonds went through at a yield below the level trading on the open market, indicating investors bid aggressively for the debt, with strong demand particularly from foreign buyers.

The dollar (.DXY) was steady against a basket of major currencies, while the euro was also unchanged at $1.3236.

U.S. crude oil rose a quarter percent to $88.59 a barrel. The bund futures rose 0.2 percent.

(Reporting by Natsuko Waki, editing by Mike Peacock)


View the original article here

Why Mutual Funds Are the Best Investment (U.S. News & World Report)

Mutual funds may not look sexy, but for most people, they're the best way to achieve financial goals. That's because mutual funds are professionally managed and offer diversification, which you don't get when you buy individual stocks.

First, let's consider why professional management matters. When you buy a fund, the fund takes your money and pools it with others' money into one big pile. The fund manager's job is to decide which stocks to buy, sell, and hold--while you're busy at work and raising children. Each manager uses a methodology or discipline to select stocks or bonds. Every day, fund managers and their team of analysts examine the companies they own to see if they still fit their criteria for securities selection.

[See Make the Most Out of Mid-Life Financial Planning.]

Fund managers spend a lot of time visiting the companies in which they invest. Sure, they can read a research report about a company. By meeting company executives face-to-face, fund managers can get a much better sense of how the company operates and what advantages it has over competitors. Fund managers also visit with a company's competitors. Plus, managers do what's known as "channel checks," which means they visit the company's stores or customers. For example, if a fund manager owns shares of Best Buy (BBY), he'll visit a store to see how many customers are there and what people are buying.

The other advantage of owning a mutual fund over an individual stock is diversification, which you don't get if you invest small amounts of money in a few securities. For example, if you have $10,000 to invest, you can buy maybe 100 shares of five stocks. When you buy a mutual fund, it might own 50 to 100 stocks, so if one stock blows up, the entire fund won't go down in flames. The manager makes sure that the fund is not too heavily exposed to any one stock or sector.

That means fund managers have to do their own housekeeping. They analyze the weightings of companies the fund owns and watch as the stocks become more or less valuable. They will sell some shares of one holding if something else looks more attractive.

Most individual investors don't have the skills and time to monitor and examine each holding the way a professional fund manager does every day. Fund managers are trained to stick to their discipline and be decisive, and are not emotionally attached to your money. Professionals, whether they're in sports or management or investing, usually know the ropes much better than amateurs.

There's another advantage of mutual funds: Investors tend not to trade funds as often as stocks, which helps their returns over time.

Certainly, mutual funds don't have the pizzazz of the hot stocks of the moment. If you're looking for entertainment, go gambling in Las Vegas. But if you want to accumulate real money for your retirement and other goals, mutual funds are the safer bet.

[For tips on how to find the best mutual funds, see 5 Ways to Find the Best Mutual Funds.]

Adam Bold is the founder of The Mutual Fund Store, which provides fee-only investment advice with locations coast-to-coast. He's also host of The Mutual Fund Show, a call-in radio program broadcast across the country. Bold is author of the book The Bold Truth about Investing (April, 2009). Bold is Chief Investment Officer of The Mutual Fund Research Center, an SEC registered investment adviser which provides mutual fund and asset allocation recommendations and research to stores in The Mutual Fund Store system.


View the original article here

World Promethean wipes off-target price as FTSE 100 rises

But analysts said: "as a whole, given the decline of the c.75pc in the course of actions of Promethean since the intellectual property offices (and c.30pc), last week, the day of the profit warning we believe future dark is updated for the company." We believe not proceed as U.S. budget eventually recover in 2012 and society began to grow once more. ?

Despite cutting, Promethean 1? pink p 57.75 as partners in Sturgis, Manager of funds, raised its participation in a little more 5MC.

Interactive whiteboards aside, the most excitement was among major FTSE J Sainsbury actors stole Tesco entertainment as whispers resurfaced - again - that State Qatar investors could snaffle supermarket chain.

Although Tesco was the one results optimistic, 15.3 - ball Sainsbury or 4 28pc - p vertical on reheated gossip Qatar whose investment authority has a 27 5pc its participation in the retailer could be an inclination of society. This time, the figure being brandished threat was 450 p apart.

Qatar could not buy three years Sainsbury's, but she has invested in a string of international companies it seeks to diversify. Qatar Holding - Division on investment Qatar Investment Authority - buy Harrods earlier this year for about £ 1. 5bn.

But the merchants urged caution on speculation. The prospect of a bid for Sainsbury Qatar made before tours - when rumours supply resumed cropped in October last year, shares stir-fry Sainsbury 10pc in a single day. In July of this year, shot Sainsbury until almost 5MC that speculation swept once more the market.

Traders noted that Sainsbury's ' increase could have as much to do with third-quarter results and news that the retailer was seeing a pick-up request he leads in Tesco period peak Christmas trade.

However, with Tesco amounting to a mere 10 to 430 Sainsbury of the Eclipse p its largest peer yesterday.

Rehash rumors about the Sainsbury's has helped market rally one day when the mood was also clarified by rising prices of raw materials. As metals hit new heights, minor lit up the rankings. Africa Barrick Gold claimed pole position, putting on 34? 600 percent, then that Antofagasta gained 71% to £ 15.28.

With minor heavy weight on the rise, the FTSE 100 obtained 38.17 38.17 points to 5808.45, while the FTSE 250 points 11299.44 148.09. Wednesday, investors will be discover that is defined for the promotion and demotion of CPI.

A final decision will be based on Tuesday closing price Wednesday, but indicative positions suggest that IMI could enter the FTSE 100 leave Cobham. IMI has 34 948 p while than Cobham 195.9 p 1.4.

Betfair may be set to enter the FTSE 250, while the Yell Group could be on the path of. Betfair on 62% to £ file while Yell throw 0.02 at 12.10 p.

Making an appearance alongside Sainsbury's ranking was Unilever thanks to an optimistic note from Michael Steib, an analyst at Morgan Stanley receives consumer giant a double-upgrade - boosting its position on "overweight"underweight"Unilever and raise his price target to £ 23.00 from £ 19.00.

In a note entitled "The New 'Unilever Model'", he wrote that while challenges remain "formidable", broker has been "encouraged by how Unilever appears more reshape its growth strategy".

He added that many risks - as competition and fresh produce - are now well understood by investors and must be taken into account in the pricing actions. Unilever has increased 53% to £ compared.

With investors optimistic mood, defensive were on the decline - National Grid throw 5 547?p and AstraZeneca has fallen from £ 30.27? 6?p.

Among liners of a second, a series of housebuilders were in first place after Bellway said he expected net profit before taxes for the first half of up 20pc.

Signs of a more promising prospect for the peer supported the Bellway housebuilders. Kaki, Taylor Wimpey and Barratt Developments put on 416.4 p, 33.7 1.77 to 29 percent and 7? to 86.3. But Bellway claimed gold medal over in more 54? 612?p.

Saint Modwen developer has also benefited from JP Morgan Cazenove boost "overweight" to "neutral" rating in an extensive review of the property sector. Analysts said St Modwen stock was lower by 22pc for three months. St Modwen increased hereditary 151 p.

Suffering from a carefree bearish note was supergroup. The retailer behind worship wear used by artists such as David Beckham, reduce back his losses at the beginning at the end of the 2 p to £ estimate. After having tripled its price starts from floating p 500 in March, brokers were optimistic about the prospects of the supergroup - last month, Goldman Sachs has begun to cover with a "conviction buy" rating and a price of £ 21.00 target.

But execution of noble broke ranks, start with a rating of "selling" and the fair value of £ 11.65 supergroup.

Analysts said the current assessment required "flawless execution" and raised concerns about the brand growth rates. Said broker supergroup naturally takes advantage of incentives offered by the owners, but questioned whether this would lead to brand expand too quickly and to early saturation.


View the original article here

World markets awaiting key US jobs data (AP)


View the original article here

World Wide Intelligence

PowerPoint Video Backgrounds 01 from A Luna Blue. Energize you next PowerPoint presentation with full screen royalty free stock footage fully optimized for use in PowerPoint. Creative video imagery for use in virtually any PowerPoint project. The CD-ROM contains 28 full screen broadcast quality video clips converted to WMV format for use in PowerPoint. Technical Specifications: Encoded Windows Media Video 9 Professional (WMV) at 640 x 480 15fps 5300Kbps.

Price: $17.49


Click here to buy from Amazon

Initial offer GM now world is greater

NEW YORK - First public call to General Motors Co became largest 23.1 billion worldwide after underwriters quickly took additional actions after IP offices last week.

Added shares vaulted GM past agricultural Bank of China 22.1 billion in July pit and pointed out the strong demand for stock of taxpayer-saving automobile constructor.

GM said Friday that the underwriters led by Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase & co, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch and Citigroup Inc., exercised their complete an additional ordinary shares 71.7 million 2.37 billion option.

Also, they have exercised an option to purchase preferred shares of $ 650 million 13 million.

Underwriters had 30 days from the IPO to exercise the options.

Pit of GM would have been smaller than AgBank China GM last week had raised $ 20.1 billion in an Office of industrial property of common and preferred shares in what was the BPI US more jamais.Sans preferred shares.

November 18, their first day of trading, shares increased by 3.6 %.Ils closed Friday up to $33 cents to 33.81, or 2.5 percent higher than the price of pit $ 33.

Government us rescue GM for 50 billion dollars after the bankruptcy of 2009 by the vehicle manufacturer.

The IPO cap the first step of a turnaround that took the constructor of 102 years of death to an improbable flotation of Wall Street favorite in 2010.

Successful debut stock can help Obama administration support for the controversial GM taxpayer bailout was valid.

The White House says U.S. taxpayers are on track to retrieve the full investment carried out by the administration and that she wished to make substantial progress towards the fall game Government entirely by the community at the end of 2012.

The strong response to the sale of shares reflects confidence growing investor that GM is moving beyond its unpopular bankruptcy, funded by the taxpayer with greatly reduced costs and higher profit potential.

US Treasuries remain main shareholder in GM after the IPOs with one-third of the shares outstanding.

Barclays Capital, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Credit Switzerland and the Royal Bank of the Canada are other major GM.Lazard insurers and Boston Consulting Group served as advisors to Trésor.Evercore Partners advised GM.

In the days prior to the IPO, the price range and number of shares, including preferred, have all increased.

GM last week sold 478 million common shares for $33 each 15.77 billion, as well as 4.35 billion in preferred shares, raising more than planned originally 4 billion.

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters.Cliquez on restrictions.


View the original article here

Black Friday 2010: why it is important for the rest of the world

A consumer shows a television, which he has purchased for sale before dawn store target of Glenview, Illinois.?Photo: EPA

United States the busiest shopping day of the year is, for analysts and investors, while about what insight offers in how the largest global economy happen in the period key shopping holiday.


In simple terms, sneezing American consumers and we could all catch a cold.


Consumer spending represents an estimated 70pc of U.S. - economic activity while some quibble with this figure - and led to global demand during the boom of the Decade.


As the world emerges a deep recession, the strength of the recovery depends always significantly U.S. consumer spending habits now rather short cash.


The problem is that the rapid worldwide wholesale lost his piggybank release equity which was funded by the rising house prices and is also concerned at high levels of unemployment.


Friday - to mark the key Christmas time period with discount purchases and eye-wateringly early opening hours - analysts provides the first indication how U.S. consumers hold for weeks that are make or break for the benefits of black retailers.


Some say that the day is not as important traditionally believed, pointing to historical data showing that it is not a strong indicator for the season as a whole.


But investors for more information on the U.S. consumer hunger means that markets can skyrocket or news about how Black Friday is panoramic fall.


Two years ago, the Dow Jones, the U.S. stock market index, 6 6pc lost for two days after Black Friday proved disappointing for retailers.


View the original article here

World stocks mostly higher, euro steadies (AP)

LONDON – World stocks mostly rose Thursday following an upbeat finish on Wall Street before the Thanksgiving break in the U.S., but the euro failed to get much of a boost amid concerns that Europe's debt crisis could soon embroil Portugal or, more dangerously, Spain.

In Europe, the FTSE 100 index of leading British shares was up 20.46 points, or 0.4 percent, at 5,677.56 while Germany's DAX rose 17.92 points, or 0.3 percent, to 6,841.72. The CAC-40 in France was 4.22 points, or 0.1 percent, lower at 3,743.39.

After a torrid start to the week, when worries about Europe's debt crisis became more acute following Ireland's request for a massive financial bailout and amid mounting tensions on the Korean peninsula, stocks have recovered their poise. The boost came mostly from figures Wednesday showing a sharp drop in weekly U.S. jobless claims and encouraging consumer confidence figures ahead of the crucial Christmas shopping season.

The U.S. economic data confirmed that the economic recovery continues and may actually be picking up pace.

However, investors remain cautious about whether the improvement will do much to get the U.S. unemployment rate down from near 10 percent. That is a key priority for both the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve, which earlier this month announced that it was pumping up to $600 billion into the U.S. economy over the coming months to help get unemployment down and prevent a dangerous bout of deflation — that is, falling prices.

Investors also remain watchful of developments in Europe's debt crisis, which has already forced both Greece and Ireland to tap their partners in the eurozone and the International Monetary Fund for bailout money.

On Wednesday, the Irish government unveiled another euro15 billion worth of austerity measures in return for an estimated euro85 billion ($113 billion) financial lifeline.

It's done little to shore up confidence in the bond markets as investors continue to fret about the country's political instability — on Tuesday, Ireland's premier Brian Cowen bowed to the inevitable and confirmed that the country will be going to the polls early next year if the 2011 budget, scheduled for Dec. 7, is passed.

"Complicating matters further, the leading opposition party signaled that they will re-examine any IMF-EU deal if they come to power in an early 2011 general election," said Carl Campus, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets.

As a result the euro is finding it difficult to garner much lost ground despite the general rise in risk appetite since the U.S. jobless claims figures.

The improvement in risk appetite would normally give the euro a boost against the dollar — when investors have a greater interest in riskier investments, stocks usually get a boost, while the dollar loses some of its safe haven shine.

By mid afternoon London time, the euro was up 0.1 percent on the day at $1.3340.

On Wednesday, the euro slid to a two-month low of $1.3282, over five cents down since Monday's peak of $1.3786.

The real big concern in the markets, though, remains whether Portugal or Spain will be dragged into the mire.

The prevailing view in the markets is that Europe may be able to support Portugal but that a bailout of Spain would be one step too far and that the euro project itself could be in jeopardy. Spain accounts for around 10 percent of the eurozone economy, in contrast with the other three countries, which account for around 2 percent each.

Bond yields in the so-called periphery countries continued to edge up Thursday, in a further sign that the eurozone's debt crisis is a long way from being solved. The yield on Spain's 10-year bonds was up another 0.13 percentage point at 5.19 percent, while Portugal's was steady at 7 percent.

Investors are also keeping a close watch on developments in east Asia following Tuesdays' exchange of artillery between North Korea and South Korea.

"Whilst Seoul may have shown restraint over recent events, there's still the uncertainty of what Pyongyang could do next to bear in mind," said Ben Potter, research analyst at IG Markets.

Asian markets ended mostly higher earlier.

Japan's Nikkei 225 stock average rose 0.5 percent to 10,079.76, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng index added 0.1 percent to 23,054.68. South Korea's Kospi index gained 0.1 percent to 1,927.68. Australia's S&P/ASX was up 0.2 percent at 4,593.4.

Chinese shares closed higher on Thursday, tracking overseas gains, buoyed by property and oil refiners. The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index gained 1.3 percent to 2,898.26 while the Shenzhen Composite Index for China's smaller, second exchange edged 0.3 percent higher to 1,337.83.

Benchmark oil for January delivery was up 43 cents to $84.29 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

____

Associated Press writer Pamela Sampson in Bangkok contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Why You Should Buy Stocks That Pay Dividends (U.S. News & World Report)

Since the financial crisis took a huge toll on their portfolios, investors en masse have taken refuge in bonds. From the beginning of 2009 through the end of this past September, they pulled a total of $38 billion out of stock funds, according to the Investment Company Institute. Meanwhile, they poured $618 billion into bond funds. "Investors' tolerance for risk seems to be lower than it has been for quite a while," says Brian Reid, chief economist for ICI. Little wonder. After years of climbing at an average yearly clip of more than 18 percent, the S&P 500 index is in the red for the past decade.

But with yields low and prices high, it's time to rethink bonds as your safe bet, experts say. The Federal Reserve has kept the target range for the federal funds rate between zero and 0.25 percent since December 2008 in hopes that low rates will help jump-start the economy. A rate hike isn't expected to come until the second half of 2011 at the earliest. But "rates are going to have to go up at some point," says Brian Gendreau, market strategist with Financial Network. When that happens, the price of the bonds will go down. Even people invested in supersafe treasuries will find themselves losing money unless they own individual bonds and hold them to maturity.

[See the 10 Best Large-Cap Growth Funds for the Long Term.]

No one can time the Fed's decision, but one move you might make in preparation is to shift part of your bond portfolio into dividend-paying stocks. While stocks are inherently riskier than bonds, these shares are generally less volatile than other types of stocks and in many cases offer income-hungry investors attractive yields relative to bonds. They tend to do well in a rising rate environment, which is usually a sign that the economy is picking up. When the economic picture improves, companies generally raise their dividend payouts slowly over time, says Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at Standard & Poor's. "Overall, you're looking at a positive scenario." The number of companies raising their dividend was up 57 percent during the third quarter over the same period last year, according to S&P.

[See top-rated funds by category ranked by U.S. News Score.]

Two funds with a strict dividend mandate and good performance records are Vanguard Dividend Growth (symbol VGIDX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The former focuses on strong, steadily growing companies with a long history of boosting dividend payouts year after year. The latter is an exchange-traded fund tracking an index of companies that have increased their annual dividends for at least the past 10 years. It holds about 140 stocks of well-established companies in various sectors such as Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and Chevron. Year-to-date, the funds are up 7 percent and 10 percent, respectively.

Meanwhile, back in your bond portfolio, it's best not to reach for higher yield by buying treasuries with longer maturities. Those securities may look most appealing now, but they'll be hit harder when rates move upward. It's important to be diversified among a range of fixed-income assets and maturities, says John Diehl, senior vice president in the retirement division of The Hartford. Two bond fund favorites of Alice Lowenstein, director of managed portfolios at investment research firm Litman/Gregory, are PIMCO Total Return (PTTAX) as a core holding and Loomis Sayles Bond (LSBDX) as a supporting player.

[See 7 Great Dividend Funds.]

PIMCO's manager Bill Gross generally sticks to offerings in the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (the most commonly cited bond index), though he will occasionally invest in other sectors like high-yield bonds or emerging-markets debt. Loomis Sayles Bond is a multisector bond fund that, at the end of September, had no exposure to U.S. government debt. The funds are up an average annual 7 percent and 10 percent, respectively, over the last 10 years. Tom Lydon, editor of ETFTrends.com, suggests the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD), which covers the medium-term investment-grade corporate bond universe. It has returned 10 percent so far this year.

High-yield bond funds may merit a look, too. The junk-bond default rate is down dramatically from 13 percent at the end of 2009, according to Moody's Investors Service. Moody's expects it to sink below 2 percent by mid-2011 as companies regain their footing.


View the original article here

Mutual Funds Are Not Buy-and-Forget Investments (U.S. News & World Report)

Many people believe that they can reach their investment goals by simply buying mutual funds. After all, investing in a group of funds that hold different kinds of stocks, bonds, and commodities is supposed to provide diversification, which can give some protection when the markets are down and better returns when prices rise. That's not necessarily true. All funds aren't created equal; some are better than others. Investors have to pay attention to all of the funds in their portfolio regularly, because even good funds can go bad.

It's not easy to distinguish the good funds from the bad ones. The main things to consider are the fund manager and performance. You've heard the disclaimer that's on every investment product: "Past performance does not guarantee future results." Don't listen to that. In my view, past performance--that is, the fund manager's past performance--is the most important factor when deciding to buy a fund. Reviewing a fund manager's performance over different time periods gives an idea how that fund behaves in various market environments.

[See How and When to Start Saving For Retirement.]

It's a lot like baseball. The New York Yankees, which has many of the top players in the league, won the World Series in 2009. This year, the team won enough to make it to the American League Championship Series, but didn't beat the Texas Rangers to advance to the World Series. Similarly, if a fund manager can navigate the trends in the market over different time periods and holds the right securities, there's a good shot that it will be a superior performer. Check a fund's performance over one-, three-, five- and 10-year time frames. If a fund manager has been in the top 20 percent of all funds in those periods, she or he is a consistent winner.

However, some star fund managers can't keep up with changing markets. For example, Bill Miller at Legg Mason Capital Management Value fund (LMVTX) has struggled after beating the S&P 500 index for 15 years from 1991 to 2005. There's no reason to hang on to a fund that has lost its luster. You're not married to that fund manager. There are plenty of other funds that may provide better returns.

To avoid hanging on to losing funds too long, check the funds you own every quarter. You should sell a fund if the reasons you bought it have changed, such as the manager has left, or you have simply found a better fund.

[See 7 Money Tips for Twentysomethings.]

Some people won't sell a fund because they don't want to pay taxes. That's not a reason to stick with a fund. Let's say you invested $10,000 in a large-cap value fund in April, and the market struggles over the next several months, so by November your investment hasn't budged. The fund company's website says it expects a 15 percent capital gains distribution (usually paid in December). If you don't sell the fund before the "shareholder-of-record" date for distributions, you'll receive a 1099 form from the fund company obligating you to pay taxes on that $1,500 distribution, even though you didn't enjoy any gains. You're better off selling the fund at a loss before the record date of distribution in early December to avoid the tax hit. Then, move the investment to another fund that won't have a large distribution. (If you need more help with tax-efficient investing strategies, ask a financial adviser or accountant.)

Another reason some investors put off dumping a fund is that some funds have back-end loads (deferred sales charges). If your fund has risen 5 percent while another fund with similar risk has gone up 10 percent, you're losing the opportunity to make more money. If you do have an underperformer, it can make good sense to sell it and pay the back-end load so that you can move on to better funds. When you forget your funds, you risk missing better investments and the potential for more money.

Adam Bold is the founder of The Mutual Fund Store, which provides fee-only investment advice with locations coast-to-coast. He's also host of The Mutual Fund Show, a call-in radio program broadcast across the country. Bold is author of the book The Bold Truth about Investing (April, 2009). He is Chief Investment Officer of The Mutual Fund Research Center, an SEC registered investment adviser which provides mutual fund and asset allocation recommendations and research to stores in The Mutual Fund Store system.


View the original article here

World stocks fall on Europe debt woes, Korea clash (AP)

LONDON – World markets and the euro slid Tuesday as investors worried that Ireland's debt crisis will spread to other fiscally weak European nations and following news that North Korea had fired artillery rounds into South Korean territory, reportedly killing at least two marines.

In Europe, the FTSE 100 index of leading British shares was down 55.82 points, or 1 percent at 5,625.01 while Germany's DAX fell 52.77 points, or 0.8 percent, to 6,769.28. The CAC-40 in France was 60.06 points, or 1.6 percent, lower at 3,758.83.

Wall Street was also poised to open sharply lower despite encouraging U.S. economic growth figures — Dow futures were down 99 points, or 0.9 percent, at 11,066 while the broader Standard & Poor's 500 futures fell 12.6 points, or 1.1 percent, at 1,185.30.

Sentiment, already downbeat as Europe's debt crisis shows few signs of abating, was hit further by the news that North Korea bombarded the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong, near their disputed western border, setting buildings ablaze and killing at least two marines, according to South Korean officials

"As if all of the European sovereign issues weren't enough, and they are, markets were further roiled as North Korea, with impeccable timing, decided to show its military might," said Jennifer Lee, an analyst at BMO Financial Group.

Rising geopolitical tensions prompt investors to rein in risky trades, such as stocks, and pile into what are widely considered to be safer harbors for their cash, such as the dollar, the Swiss franc and gold.

Continuing to weigh on sentiment is the fear that Europe's debt problems have not been solved by the Irish government's decision to ask for a financial bailout from the European Union and International Monetary Fund.

Experts said the bailout, which is expected to amount to around euro90 billion ($123 billion), has done little to shield other heavily indebted countries from a potential collapse in investor confidence.

Portugal and Spain are considered the next nations most vulnerable to market turmoil after the rescue of Greece and Ireland. Spain is the big worry for EU policymakers because it accounts for around 10 percent of the euro-zone economy, in contrast to Greece, Ireland and Portugal, which account for less than 2 percent each.

"Bailing out weaker partners is fast becoming seen as little more than strapping a band-aid on a gaping flesh wound," said Andrew Wilkinson, senior market analyst at Interactive Brokers.

Investors are also worried that the activation of the bailout will not be as smooth as hoped, as Ireland's premier Brian Cowen fights for his future. Lawmakers in his own party have mounted a rebellion to try to oust him, an effort that could trigger a snap election and delay a massive EU-IMF bailout of Ireland.

On Monday, Cowen pledged to call elections early next year if an austerity budget is passed. His announcement was triggered by the decision by the Green Party to withdraw its support for the government, even though it pledged to back the 2011 budget, due to be unveiled on Dec. 7.

These concerns, coupled with the heightened geopolitical tensions, weighed on the euro — by mid afternoon London time, the euro was down 1 percent at $1.3490.

Reports of North Korea's attack on its neighbor came as Asian trading was drawing to a close. South Korea's Kospi closed down 0.8 percent at 1,928.94.

Elsewhere, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index tumbled 2.7 percent to 22,896.14 and China's Shanghai Composite Index shed 1.9 percent to 2,828.28 with sentiment additionally impacted by mounting expectations Beijing will take more steps to cool inflation that could slow economic growth. Japan's markets were shut for a national holiday.

Given what's going on in Europe and Asia, there was little reaction in the markets to the news that the U.S. economy grew by more than previously predicted during the third quarter of the year. The Commerce Department reported that the world's largest economy grew at an annualized rate of 2.5 percent, up on the previous estimate of 2 percent.

In the oil markets, benchmark crude for January delivery was down $1.36 to $80.38 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

___

AP Business Writer Kelvin Chan in Hong Kong contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Manufacturers can help make a world leader of Great Britain

The British manufactured exports followed the recovery in global trade much better than those of other sectors of the economy.

The economic recovery of the United Kingdom was always likely to evolve in tiered and and even if it is a year since we've turned a corner, feeling of uncertainty is that slightly diminué.Nous we only examine Ireland sea to remember that there are always reasons of prudence.


Person, no less a Government with spending considerable reductions in the sights, should assume that a revival of the private sector will continue to benefit from boost .and, while any growth must be allowed, we must learn the lessons of the past decade by a balance. This means the right kind of more balanced growth innovation, investment and exports the United Kingdom prosperity.


Starting at least in this regard the mood of cautious is tainted by optimism. The United Kingdom has made some progress in laying the foundations for sustainable growth, where manufacturers can take important credit.The past four quarters saw a strong and positive industry contribution to United Kingdom where exit has expanded at its fastest pace since the end of the last recession of the economy in 1994.


An important component of this has been ability of manufacturers to capitalize on the export markets.The UK manufactured exports followed the recovery in global trade much better than those of other sectors of the economy. recent studies examining the shape of British industry EEF shows that while growth plans were derailed inevitably to the recession, the goal for the next three years is additional gains in global markets, underpinned investment in new machinery and innovation to the United Kingdom.


This activity by manufacturers, if realized, will go a long way to fill the void left as public sector retreats. In the last decade, manufacturing has demonstrated its diversity, the strength and the ability to provide significant gains in productivity and competitiveness.As the responsibility for creating jobs and wealth now falls more and more on the shoulders of the private sector, production will have to translate the gains of recent years a progressive change in growth.


To do this requires manufacturers of all shapes and tailles.Nous we need creative companies bringing creative innovation and ideas in the market as well as large enterprises that supply anchor chains and make crucial investments that benefit the entire industries.


Herein lies the challenge.With internal and external obstacles to overcome start-up companies at both ends of the spectrum, is unable to fund their initial growth with internal resources alone, but fighting for access to external financing.Intermediate companies, planning growth transformation that could make global players can get caught in a thicket of administrative formalities, such as regulation of employment and a tax system always unpredictable.


A generation of large manufacturers expand each year growth is vital for the wider economy and growth potential of the nation.As just the Government out of its framework of papermaking growth and in the coming weeks, it must provide an extensive growth program that works for all sectors and types of enterprises.


It must also recognize where blockages to the right kind of growth.It starts with the Government becomes more a strategic partner with the private sector.


Partnership with the industry can help UK investment choice location, with a very competitive internationally and a solid base, business environment visible and industrielle.Il requires the Government to be opened in its approach to the future of manufacturing and limit not his vision only to a narrow R & d in so-called industries 'High tech' it must also establish a tax system that encourages innovation and investment capitaux.enfin, to maximize the impact of public resources, the Government should focus its strategy in high growth industries where the United Kingdom has a competitive advantage, as well as the large corporations that cascading benefits in the supply chain and of wider as leverage skills areas multiplier effect.


Prime Minister was right when he said in a recent speech that the Government must do more that just depart from route.Un change in focus of the public to the private sector is essential to growth at long terme.Dans as a whole, there are reasons to be confident in the manufacture of sustainable economic growth needs to generate for the United Kingdom, but we cannot hold acquis.Il will have ambition, certainty and the more competitive environment Government can provide companies to achieve these ambitions here .If United Kingdom is delivered we as a nation can legitimately expect our business leaders to step up to the mark.


Terry Scuoler is CEO of EEF, organization manufacturers


View the original article here

China policy tightening weighs on world markets (AP)

LONDON – Stock markets fell Friday after China took further steps to rein in lending and amid worries that a financial rescue package for Ireland is proving more difficult to agree than expected.

In Europe, the FTSE 100 index of leading British shares was down 58.54 points, or 1 percent, at 5,710.17 while Germany's DAX fell 21.68 points, or 0.3 percent, to 6,810.43. The CAC-40 in France was 21.39 points, or 0.6 percent, lower at 3,846.58.

U.S. stocks were also poised for a pullback at the open following sizable gains Thursday — Dow futures were down 39 points, or 0.4 percent, at 11,137 while the broader Standard & Poor's 500 futures fell 3.1 points, or 0.3 percent, to 1,194.60.

Weighing on sentiment was the news that China's monetary authorities have ordered its banks to hold back more money as reserves in a new move to curb lending and cool inflation.

That was the second reserve increase in two weeks and came as Beijing tries to restore normal financial conditions and curb inflation, which rose to a 25-month high of 4.4 percent last month.

The central bank ordered lenders to set aside an additional 0.5 percent of their deposits, with effect from November 29.

The worry in stock markets is that tighter Chinese monetary policy will dent growth prospects. That's important because China is now the world's second largest economy.

"As a result, yesterday's risk appetite is not carrying over," said Robert Kavcic, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets.

The decision was announced after Chinese stock markets had closed higher following a fairly torrid few days, which has seen the country's major indexes shed around 10 percent of their value, largely on concerns of tighter Chinese policy.

The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index rose 22.15 points, or 0.8 percent, to 2,887.60. The Shenzhen Composite Index for China's smaller, second exchange climbed 2.9 percent to 1,297.48.

U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke took a swipe at China in his keynote speech at a banking conference in Frankfurt, Germany, arguing that the country's inflexible currency regime, which has the yuan effectively pegged at a low rate against the dollar, is preventing a much-needed rebalancing of growth in the global economy.

Bernanke has faced a barrage of criticism over the past couple of weeks, both in and out of the U.S., after the Fed decided to pump another $600 billion into the U.S. economy, in effect to get unemployment down.

His argument, which has many backers in the international community, is that the U.S. needs to export more and consume less, while China needs to do the opposite.

Investors are also keeping a close watch on developments in Dublin to see if a bailout package for Ireland emerges following discussions between the Irish government and representatives from the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank.

Speculation that a financial bailout package that could run up to euro100 billion will be agreed had increased Thursday after leading Irish officials, including the country's leading central bank and the finance minister, hinted that a rescue deal was in the offing.

However, investors are concerned that a standoff is developing between Ireland and its partners in the eurozone, notably Germany and France over Ireland's exceptionally low level of corporate tax.

The worry in the markets is that the Irish government's apparent refusal to consider changes its 12.5 percent tax rate will prevent a deal from being agreed soon.

"Traders seem exceptionally wary of the path ahead and with various spats looming, such as questions over the country's incredibly low corporation tax rates, the debate could drag on for some time yet," said Anthony Grech, head of research at IG Index.

Elsewhere in Asia, Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average gained 0.1 percent to close at 10,022.39 and South Korea's Kospi added 0.7 percent to 1,940.96. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was 0.2 percent lower at 4,629.2, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng fell 0.1 percent at 23,605.71.

In the currency markets, the euro continued its recent recovery, trading 0.3 percent higher on the day at $1.3686 while the dollar fell 0.1 percent to 83.41 yen.

Benchmark oil for December delivery was up 11 cents to $81.96 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

___

Associated Press writer Pamela Sampson in Bangkok contributed to this report.


View the original article here

How tea is brewing in difficulty for the currencies of the world

It is not simply that the Summit did not lead to decent solutions: it has failed to properly diagnose the problem itself. The fact that countries become aggressive about currency is merely a symptom of a much deeper problem: the international monetary system has failed, and there are zero willing or able to find a work of reconstruction.

We are in the midst of a change in the international monetary structures, such as happened at Bretton Woods in the 1940s, or crossing over the years floating exchange rates 1970.La probability is that at least some of the features of globalization, now we take for granted - the free movement of capital, the push to reduce barriers to trade, independent central banks and the floating currencies - only survive not Beaver for many years.

Travel stories like this occur only once each half century or if and usually involve a period of economic instability, international tension and a general feeling of anxiety about the future when in addition, there is no money shot and there is rarely a clear roadmap. Bretton Woods was the exception rather than the rule.

That being said, the dilemma is actually quite simple. In an ideal world we would like to have fixed rates of Exchange, so that companies can share internationally without worrying about the movements of the currency), free movement of capital (investors can put money where it is most needed) independent of domestic monetary policy (so you set interest rates depends on how fast or slow your economy grows).

Unfortunately, it can have two of these three at any time.In the 19th century gold standard, decision-makers abandons independent national monetary policy in favour of a system of fixed exchange rates (ex aequo gold) and the movement free capital.puis in the 1940s to the 1970s, the Bretton Woods system still selected fixed currencies, but abandoned the free movement of capital in favour of an independent monetary policy.Since the 1970s for Western nations today swung behind the floating currencies and the free movement of capital, while retaining the independent monetary policy.

Unfortunately, this latest iteration (III of globalization, call it) is beset by the fact that in many developing countries (represented by China) chose instead to fix their currency (in an effort to protect their exports) and the upshots was contributed to the crisis of recent years savings glut. The G20 is less specific arguments on the level of currency and the fact that the monetary system is executed in two incompatible ways more.

What makes it worse there is more consensus view about who is right: before the crisis of Western politicians could say with confidence that mercantilist policies China have simply been tort.Mais why emerging nations should not protect their industries from international competition in order to become a mature business - just like the United Kingdom and the United States did in a similar stage in their development?

Therefore not only international monetary structure broke was therefore the intellectual grounding that may reveal a solution. It wasn't a question in the 1940s, when John Maynard Keynes and United States delegate Harry Dexter White could lock themselves away in a new England ski resort.Importance in the 1870s when central bankers could safely negotiate the terms of the gold away from indiscreet eyes of the population.But this time above democracy is the intrusion.

To the United States, the White House is still upset after the elections of mid-term, in which the Democrats have been the largest turnover of members since 1954.Ce is not merely the extent of defeat – which is even more striking when you look at the State level and will counties - or even the fact that the White House, is no longer easily pass laws, but the new supported Republican politicians (the Tea Party in particular wing) is viscerally opposed to country's current economic policies.

Republicans used to be the Party of the Washington consensus, free trade and deregulation - brief supporting globalization III does ' is: a recent report by the Pew Research Center found that the Republican party is now more hostile than Democrats trade.A large number of votes of the tea party leader want to abolition of the Federal Reserve.The mi-conditions message was that these voices is safer can be ignored.And if the United States itself cannot operate a plan to overhaul the international economy, what hope is there for the rest of us?

It is not that anyone is inherently fair or injuste.Mais worse outcome would be to reverse from one extreme to another without a coherent plan.

Take the idea of a gold standard, raised by the World Bank President Robert Zoellick, the week dernière.Il has some instant attraction to bind gold, Chief among them that this limits the ability of Governments to inflate their way out of their problems debt significative.Mais coins there are also serious disadvantages: referencing your money to a good still leaves you vulnerable to inflation or deflation, depending on the quantity of this product is extracted from the Earth in a given year.

It would also mean end to Bank as we know - 19th century has shown us that failures of the gold standard with our system of fractional reserve more disabling bancaire.Mais, this would mean that Governments could adjust are no longer the rate of interest depending on health or otherwise of their original system économie.Le proved incompatible with democracy given généralisée.étant volume behind the electorate in the US, why is different this time?

Furthermore, why arbitrary obsession gold? main reason Britain established a gold standard (and other), instead of a standard money goes towards a mathematical error by Sir Isaac Newton in 1717, then master of the Mint, the overvaluation of Guinea in terms of money.

Gold standard is simply another set of rules that determine how the countries run their economies: these rules do survive that as long as people believe the Government or Central Bank, will follow their.

In the wake of the flop g-20, it seems to me that there are two CFL conceivable to break the current deadlock on economic reform internationale.Ni, I want you to warn is particularly attractive.

The first is that it only be after another crisis (debt perhaps, perhaps a real war currency) leaders will confront the issue and try to create a coherent international monetary system.

The second is the hegemonic stability theory: periods of such chaos usually come when an economic superpower gives way to another.

Any rules or structures policy makers try to erect, compelling instability caused by these changes by an average of global economic tectonics that we wait until China fully surpasses the United States until we can expect a return to stability.


View the original article here

BIC meets top bankers to top of the world

Paul Volcker has become one of the most influential voices in the international debate on regulation of the sector banking

Sir John Vickers, Chairman of the CBI has already met Paul Volcker, former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve and its current leader, Ben Bernanke, as well as discussions with senior officials of the European Union in charge of regulating the financial sector organization.


Mr. Volcker has become one of the most influential voices in the international debate on regulation of the sector banks and last year was behind the namesake rule was forced to give up lucrative business owners business and siphon off the coast of other complex and risky operations blamed to precipitate the global financial crisis, banks based in the United States.


The ICB may recommend that British banks turn on weapons of wholesale banking, such as calls for retail banking casino"supposed" isolated stores .a such political drama is thought new unlikely that Sir John met with the architect of reform could suggest that the commission would propose measures similar to those adopted by the administration of the Obama.


Additional visits are planned for the Australia, Canada and China, as well as Germany and the France.


The Committee includes Executive Director former Barclays, Martin Taylor, former Ofgas Director General Clare Spottiswoode, former leader of co-chief JP Morgan Bill Winters and Martin Wolf, Financial Times columnist.


To avoid controversy on the expenditure of large sums of money on travel, most visits is related to pre-existing plans travel, all Board members and it is understood that Sir John flew economy on his travels to New York, Washington and Brussels.


The period of gathering evidence in the commission closes tomorrow and will be followed by a series of public debates as well as hearings with representatives of the major banks of the United Kingdom.


View the original article here

How tea is brewing in difficulty for the currencies of the world

It is not simply that the Summit did not lead to decent solutions: it has failed to properly diagnose the problem itself. The fact that countries become aggressive about currency is merely a symptom of a much deeper problem: the international monetary system has failed, and there are zero willing or able to find a work of reconstruction.

We are in the midst of a change in the international monetary structures, such as happened at Bretton Woods in the 1940s, or crossing over the years floating exchange rates 1970.La probability is that at least some of the features of globalization, now we take for granted - the free movement of capital, the push to reduce barriers to trade, independent central banks and the floating currencies - only survive not Beaver for many years.

Travel stories like this occur only once each half century or if and usually involve a period of economic instability, international tension and a general feeling of anxiety about the future when in addition, there is no money shot and there is rarely a clear roadmap. Bretton Woods was the exception rather than the rule.

That being said, the dilemma is actually quite simple. In an ideal world we would like to have fixed rates of Exchange, so that companies can share internationally without worrying about the movements of the currency), free movement of capital (investors can put money where it is most needed) independent of domestic monetary policy (so you set interest rates depends on how fast or slow your economy grows).

Unfortunately, it can have two of these three at any time.In the 19th century gold standard, decision-makers abandons independent national monetary policy in favour of a system of fixed exchange rates (ex aequo gold) and the movement free capital.puis in the 1940s to the 1970s, the Bretton Woods system still selected fixed currencies, but abandoned the free movement of capital in favour of an independent monetary policy.Since the 1970s for Western nations today swung behind the floating currencies and the free movement of capital, while retaining the independent monetary policy.

Unfortunately, this latest iteration (III of globalization, call it) is beset by the fact that in many developing countries (represented by China) chose instead to fix their currency (in an effort to protect their exports) and the upshots was contributed to the crisis of recent years savings glut. The G20 is less specific arguments on the level of currency and the fact that the monetary system is executed in two incompatible ways more.

What makes it worse there is more consensus view about who is right: before the crisis of Western politicians could say with confidence that mercantilist policies China have simply been tort.Mais why emerging nations should not protect their industries from international competition in order to become a mature business - just like the United Kingdom and the United States did in a similar stage in their development?

Therefore not only international monetary structure broke was therefore the intellectual grounding that may reveal a solution. It wasn't a question in the 1940s, when John Maynard Keynes and United States delegate Harry Dexter White could lock themselves away in a new England ski resort.Importance in the 1870s when central bankers could safely negotiate the terms of the gold away from indiscreet eyes of the population.But this time above democracy is the intrusion.

To the United States, the White House is still upset after the elections of mid-term, in which the Democrats have been the largest turnover of members since 1954.Ce is not merely the extent of defeat – which is even more striking when you look at the State level and will counties - or even the fact that the White House, is no longer easily pass laws, but the new supported Republican politicians (the Tea Party in particular wing) is viscerally opposed to country's current economic policies.

Republicans used to be the Party of the Washington consensus, free trade and deregulation - brief supporting globalization III does ' is: a recent report by the Pew Research Center found that the Republican party is now more hostile than Democrats trade.A large number of votes of the tea party leader want to abolition of the Federal Reserve.The mi-conditions message was that these voices is safer can be ignored.And if the United States itself cannot operate a plan to overhaul the international economy, what hope is there for the rest of us?

It is not that anyone is inherently fair or injuste.Mais worse outcome would be to reverse from one extreme to another without a coherent plan.

Take the idea of a gold standard, raised by the World Bank President Robert Zoellick, the week dernière.Il has some instant attraction to bind gold, Chief among them that this limits the ability of Governments to inflate their way out of their problems debt significative.Mais coins there are also serious disadvantages: referencing your money to a good still leaves you vulnerable to inflation or deflation, depending on the quantity of this product is extracted from the Earth in a given year.

It would also mean end to Bank as we know - 19th century has shown us that failures of the gold standard with our system of fractional reserve more disabling bancaire.Mais, this would mean that Governments could adjust are no longer the rate of interest depending on health or otherwise of their original system économie.Le proved incompatible with democracy given généralisée.étant volume behind the electorate in the US, why is different this time?

Furthermore, why arbitrary obsession gold? main reason Britain established a gold standard (and other), instead of a standard money goes towards a mathematical error by Sir Isaac Newton in 1717, then master of the Mint, the overvaluation of Guinea in terms of money.

Gold standard is simply another set of rules that determine how the countries run their economies: these rules do survive that as long as people believe the Government or Central Bank, will follow their.

In the wake of the flop g-20, it seems to me that there are two CFL conceivable to break the current deadlock on economic reform internationale.Ni, I want you to warn is particularly attractive.

The first is that it only be after another crisis (debt perhaps, perhaps a real war currency) leaders will confront the issue and try to create a coherent international monetary system.

The second is the hegemonic stability theory: periods of such chaos usually come when an economic superpower gives way to another.

Any rules or structures policy makers try to erect, compelling instability caused by these changes by an average of global economic tectonics that we wait until China fully surpasses the United States until we can expect a return to stability.


View the original article here

World stocks tumble amid China rate hike jitters (AP)

BEIJING – A plunge in Chinese stocks dragged world markets lower Friday as investors fretted Beijing will take new steps to cool the world's No. 2 economy and global leaders meeting in South Korea papered over currency tensions.

The losses in Asia and Europe followed a down day on Wall Street where Cisco Inc., the world's largest maker of computer networking gear, rattled investors by cutting its sales forecast for a second quarter in a row.

Oil prices tumbled below $87 after big gains the previous two days and Wall Street was set to slide. Dow futures were off 110 points, or 1 percent, at 11,132. Broader S&P futures shed 13.90, or 1.2 percent, to 1,197.20.

Markets were on edge as leaders from the Group of 20 major advanced and developing nations struggled at a summit in Seoul to resolve a U.S.-China currency dispute that threatens to escalate into a global trade war.

Adding to negative sentiment was mounting speculation that Ireland — one of Europe's most financially troubled countries — would not be able to cut public spending and may have to resort to a bailout.

China's Shanghai Composite index dived 5.2 percent to 3,310.58 amid expectations of more government measures to tighten credit and slow economic growth after inflation hit a 25-month high in October. The Shenzhen Composite Index for China's smaller second exchange slumped 6.1 percent.

"There are some rumors there might be another interest rate hike this weekend," said Linus Yip, a strategist for First Shanghai Securities in Hong Kong. The Chinese sell-off dragged down prices elsewhere in Asia, Yip said.

In early European trading, France's CAC-40 fell 1.9 percent to 3,792.31 and Germany's DAX dropped 1.1 percent to 6,653.14. Britain's FTSE 100 declined 1.1 percent to 5,749.04.

Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 stock index ended down 136.65 points, or 1.4 percent, to 9,724.81 and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 shed 0.8 percent to 4,692.70.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng fell 1.7 percent to 24,270.26 and South Korea's Kospi retreated 0.1 percent to 1,913.12. Markets in India, Singapore and Taiwan were also lower.

In Seoul, leaders of 20 major economies refused to endorse a U.S. push to get China to let its currency rise, keeping alive a dispute that has raised the specter of a global trade war.

The crux of the dispute is Washington's allegations that Beijing is artificially keeping its currency, the yuan, weak to gain a trade advantage. But the U.S. position has been undermined by its own recent policy of printing money to boost a sluggish economy, which is weakening the dollar.

In the U.S. on Thursday, the Dow Jones industrial average shed 73.94 points, or 0.7 percent, to close at 11,283.10 as the weak outlook from Cisco shook faith in the strength of the technology industry's recovery.

In currencies, the dollar fell to 82.05 yen from 82.32 yen late Thursday in New York. The euro fell to $1.3608 from $1.3648.

Benchmark crude for December delivery slid $1.59 to $86.22 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract settled unchanged at $87.81 on Thursday.


View the original article here

Bring the gold standard, explains the head of the World Bank

"While textbooks can display or as old money markets use gold as an other monetary asset today," Mr. Zoellick said photo: REUTERS

To come to a group of 20 Summit this week in Seoul, Mr. Zoellick said that a gold standard updated may help to reorganize the global economy at a time of severe tensions in the currencies and the US monetary policy.


He said that the world needs a new scheme to succeed "Bretton Woods II" floating currency system, which has been in place, given that the system of fixed-rate currency tied to gold collapsed in 1971.


The new system "is probably need to associate the dollar, the euro, the yen, pound sterling and a renminbi (Chinese yuan) moves towards internationalization, then an open capital account," he wrote in the Financial Times.


Mr. Zoellick, "the system should also consider using international gold as a point of reference of the expectations of the market on inflation, deflation and monetary values future," said in a comment piece.


"Although textbooks can display or as old money markets use gold as an other monetary asset today."


The original Bretton Woods agreement was thrown a framework led United States for the stability of the global financial system after the second world war, with the dollar pegged to gold and controls in place to limit the movement of capital.


Gold standard is believed to protect against inflation, but does not flexible monetary policy that many economists feel is essential in the fight against economic shocks.


It has been abandoned by the u.s. President Richard Nixon in 1971 as the value of the dollar collapses over gold. today, gold prices are still riding as investors seek a timeless hedge against inflation and debt the u.s. risks.


Mr. Zoellick has recognized that the forging a new monetary agreement to govern the global economy take time, two years after the worst financial crisis since the 1930s Western. ""But we need to begin", he wrote.


View the original article here

The rest of the world goes West when American prints more money

The United States had hoped that China would use Summit G20 in Seoul to accept the proposal of America net exporters should limit their current account surpluses to 4pc GDP. Perspective of which is now gone.

In the wake of the Federal Reserve QE2 Announces rather suitable measures that would relieve pressure on the US economy, China gave the States a tongue - lashing .Mesures Cape surplus trade audience would "are reminiscent of the days of the planned economy", said Cui Tiankai, which will be one of the negotiators of lead from China to Seoul.

"We believe a discussion on a misses have target account current exactly, not least because if you look at the world economy, there are many questions that deserves more attention - such as the quantitative easing".

Germany also discussed at length in the language of the industry to describe the recent decision of the Federal Reserve power."With all respect, US policy is disabled,", pointed out the Finance Minister, Wolfgang Sch?uble.

"Isn't that the Americans were not pumped enough liquidity in the market for them now even more than the pump will not solve their problems."

The Fed plan to extend QE $600bn (£ 370bn), $ 1 cost already put in place, caused the diplomatic fur fly - Thailand Australia .a South Africa, a key emerging powerful member of the g-20 market block official statement said America was "undermined the spirit of multilateral cooperation that G20 leaders have fought so hard to maintain.

Until now, the rest of the world has been willing to tolerate unprecedented United States - money-printing and in this égard.QE United Kingdom was used to assist financial institutions to avoid facing their losses, while recapitalising secretly Western banks are, for all intent and purposes, insolvent.Money-printing also inflated the last Fed induced "sugar rush" of bourse.Après, global FTSE all share index reaches a maximum of two years.

With the silver EQ used for the purchase of bills and gilts, as well as questionable mortgage-backed securities, it has also allowed Governments to maintain expenses.

Who cares if the yields on sovereign ious were artificially depressed (for the moment) by the weight of the newly created money.Implementation of spending reductions is much, much harder that announcing a tax "Keynesian" another boost

Therefore, in other words, the EQ has received enough great interest - groups insolvent banks, public sector unions and politicians laches.Pas surprising that critics have long policy we have dismissed as 'inflation nutters' and 'cranks '.

But in recent weeks, something a changé.Gros players such as China, Brazil - and Germany think too - the United States has gone too far and are now saying.

Their patience was broken, taking into account the negative impact a large scope of QE beyond of the coasts of America. "Even if everyone wants the US economy to recover, "said Guido Mantega, the Minister of Finance of highly respected Brazil"it does no good to throw $ helicopter.""

In a newspaper article, Xia Bin, an advisor to long long date at the Central Bank of China, last week referred to unbridled $ as a "great risk" printing in the global economy. ""As long as the world exerts no restraint in issuing $ then the appearance of another crisis is inevitable, as some wise Westerners complain" he wrote.

With fears that the Fed blows yet another award asset bubbles, that lead to a damaging will drop, stands of America charged (rightly) EQ artificially depress the dollar, so unfairly boost exports to the detriment of those of other u.s. including euro.Dans area using the same time, a lower u.s. dollar also reduces the real value of the enormous debt that America must rest of the world - not less Chinese.

In the here and now, emerging wholesale markets are particularly concerned that dollar debasement means their own currency to take on the status of "shelter", pushing even further, so most undermining their exportations.Brésil has already imposed controls on capital, although entendu.Et QE2, answering a string of Asian central banks expressed preparing measures to defend their country against large flows of capital.

This is not how liberal capitalism and free trade is supposed to travailler.Et, while it pains me, the main cause of this new eruption of economic dirigisme and conflicts, distortions and injustices that will inevitably produce, is the America. rather than to deal with its problems, and with them, American politicians require these problems on the rest of the world.

Now President Obama took a bite in the U.S. mi-termes, it can become even more desperate, which means that ve could extend once again, beyond this $600bn extra.

Although the negative impact of EQ in the United States has so far been felt largely in terms of competitiveness of exports and the appreciation of the currency, the policy has begun to impose much more visible "collateral damage".

Some of us were guard long printing mass money cause global to seek refuge in tangible capital assets - investors produced no less.

Many events come now pass.

New York, prices of oil reached only $87 per barrel – a maximum of two years - even if the US economy, the largest consumer of crude oil in the world, remains low.

In the past week, the inevitability of EQ- and perhaps still more EQ - a trained the curve term any oil shunt upwards, as investors bet on inflation more and more the dollar falls.

Oil exporters OPEC cartel fanned the flames, but crude price hike has been long time coming and derives from virtual press printing the Fed.

Gold broke just yet another record record - reaching $1,394 an ounce.

Pink 6pc last week in silver and is now in a maximum of 30 years.

Apart from precious metals, the nightmare is that QE causes an increase in the price of commodities and other inputs required to maintain the operation of the Western world - active investors such as "an anti-debasement coverage."

There are signs that this starts to happen more than the crude oil markets.

Since August, when the prospect more Fed QE became real, cotton prices are 68pc sugar prices have increased 66pc, rice is a third party.

This is why QE will be blamed for many "unfair" more currency devaluations and imposing a "soft default" America's creditors.

This printing money madness will be considered as the main cause of inflation, food riots and a boom in commodity prices.

This policy, in my view, is nothing less than "Suez economic America."


View the original article here

Stocks rally around the world after Fed action (AP)

WASHINGTON – Global stock markets staged an explosive rally Thursday, embracing a move by the Federal Reserve to try to rejuvenate the U.S. economy by buying $600 billion in Treasury bonds.

The Dow Jones industrial average reached its highest point in more than two years, and stocks surged from Tokyo to London.

Elsewhere around the world, economic dominoes began to fall: The dollar sank. Oil prices surged. And Asian countries raised fears that their currencies would rise relative to the dollar, making their exports more expensive.

And some fretted about the prospect of financial instability in Asia and other regions. But stock investors, at least, celebrated the Fed's move.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said the bond purchases would drive down interest rates on mortgages and other borrowing. That could get individuals and businesses to borrow and spend and aid a U.S. economy stuck with 9.6 percent unemployment.

Two developments, in particular, seemed to cheer investors: In announcing its $600 billion bond-buying program, the Fed left the door open to further action later. And in an opinion piece published Thursday, Bernanke envisioned higher stock prices as part of "a virtuous circle." He defined it this way:

Lower interest rates on loans will encourage companies to borrow and expand. Cheaper mortgages will let more people buy or refinance. Higher stock prices will boost the wealth and confidence of both individuals and businesses. Spending will rise, lifting incomes, profits and economic growth.

"A light bulb has gone on" in investors' heads, said Brian Bethune, chief U.S. financial economist at IHS Global Insight. "They're thinking: 'Maybe this will work.'"

The response to the bond-purchase program, dubbed "QE2" because it's the second round of what's called "quantitative easing," was powerful. It cut across all corners of global financial markets:

? Stocks jumped 2 percent in London, 1.9 percent in Paris, 1.6 percent in Hong Kong, 2.2 percent in Tokyo. The Dow Jones industrial average hit its highest level since August 2008, rising nearly 220 points to 11,434. Lower interest rates could spur economic growth and also make stocks more attractive compared with Treasury bonds with puny yields. In India, stocks hit a record.

? The dollar sank to a nine-month low against the euro and fell against the Japanese yen and the British pound. The Fed's bond purchases flood financial markets with dollars, diluting the dollar's value against other currencies.

? Oil prices jumped $1.73 to $86 a barrel. Foreign buyers were attracted to oil because it's priced in dollars. Demand for oil tends to rise when the dollar's value falls, because it becomes a bargain for buyers using other currencies.

? Gold prices hit a record high on fears the Fed's move will unleash inflation. Investors often seek sanctuary in gold, a tangible asset, when they fear that rising prices will erode the value of money.

? China and other countries warned that the Fed risks destabilizing the global economy by printing more dollars, the currency of international commerce. "So long as the world shows no restraint in issuing reserve currencies such as the dollar ... the outcome will be what knowledgeable Westerners dread: Yet another crisis is inevitable," Xia Bin, an adviser to the People's Bank of China, wrote in a commentary.

? Developing countries in Asia complained the money generated by the Fed purchases will join a flood of cash already pouring into the region in search of better returns. That money is pushing up their currencies and hurting their exporters. They also fear that a flood of new dollars will fan inflation, cause price bubbles in stocks and other assets and destabilize their financial systems.

As the Fed's new program drives down yields on U.S. Treasury bonds, many investors will shift money to other countries or riskier investments, such as stocks, that offer better returns.

Rising asset prices can be rewarding, at least in the short run. But over time, they raise the danger that speculators will drive prices of stocks, real estate or other assets so high that a crash, like the U.S. housing bust, becomes inevitable.

That fear is growing in Asia and elsewhere.

"These countries say, 'We cannot even absorb our own savings,'" says Marc Chandler, global head of currency strategy at the investment firm Brown Brothers Harriman. "Now we've got to handle the world's savings?"

They also worry that the "hot money" flooding into their economies will vanish once global investors find another fad to sink their money into. That would burst any bubbles in stocks or other assets, just as in the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis.

In the United States, stocks have been rallying since late August, when Bernanke announced in a speech in Jackson Hole, Wyo., that the Fed was prepared to do more to spur economic growth if necessary.

Fed leaders think Wednesday's action will be the equivalent of a three-quarter-point reduction in the Fed's benchmark interest rate. In normal times, cutting that benchmark rate by three-quarters of a percentage point could give the economy a healthy jolt. But that option is unavailable now because the Fed has already pushed that rate near zero.

Even if the Fed succeeds in reducing long-term interest rates, that doesn't mean banks will automatically ramp up lending.

Mortgage rates have already touched a record low without reviving the housing market. Banks have tightened lending standards, so fewer people qualify for loans. Even consumers who do qualify are reluctant to take on more debt. And businesses are reluctant to borrow to hire and expand until they're confident the economy will pick up.

In making the $600 billion in bond purchases, the Fed essentially prints money. It doesn't increase the debt the Treasury Department sells. Rather, the purchases expand the pool of buyers for that debt by adding the Fed to the mix.

Mindful of the weak U.S. economy and high unemployment, some want the Fed to do more, not less.

Joseph Gagnon, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former Fed official, was unimpressed by Wednesday's announcement: "This is a small step in the right direction," he says. "But I view it as timid."

He would like to see the Fed buy twice the $75 billion in bonds that it plans to buy each month. He also suggests the Fed stop paying interest on money that banks have parked with the Fed. That might force them to step up lending.

The Fed made a big impact the first time it announced quantitative easing, in March 2009. Its purchase of $1.7 trillion in government bonds and mortgage securities calmed markets still jittery after the financial crisis of 2008. It sent the Dow soaring 16 percent over the next seven weeks. And the recession ended that June, economists say.

Among those who worry about the risk of inflation or speculative bubbles is Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Hoenig dissented from the Fed's latest move for those reasons.

Bernanke discounts such fears. In his opinion piece Thursday, he expressed confidence that the Fed has the tools to soak up the extra money when the time comes, without harming the economy.

"We have made all necessary preparations, and we are confident that we have the tools to unwind these policies at the appropriate time," Bernanke said in the article published in The Washington Post.

___

AP Business Writers Jeannine Aversa and Martin Crutsinger in Washington, Joe McDonald in Beijing and Sandy Shore in Denver contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Powered by Blogger