Showing posts with label short. Show all posts
Showing posts with label short. Show all posts

NYSE short interest slips in late November, Nasdaq dips (Reuters)

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Short interest slipped on the New York Stock Exchange but was little changed on the Nasdaq in late November, two weeks before a sharp rally for stocks, according to data released by the exchanges on Thursday.

Although the S&P 500 fell 1.6 percent during the period, it has rallied more than 4 percent since the start of December as many investors predict a strong end to the year.

Short interest on the New York Stock Exchange slipped 1.2 percent to 13.65 billion shares through November 30, compared with 13.81 billion shares as of November 15.

Investors who sell securities short seek to profit from a decline in stock prices. They borrow shares and then sell them in hope of buying them back later at a cheaper price, pocketing the difference.

The short interest on November 30 was equal to 3.57 percent of the total shares outstanding, the NYSE said.

Short interest on the Nasdaq dipped 0.08 percent during the period to 7.034 billion shares, compared with 7.040 billion shares as of November 15.

The short interest on Nasdaq was 3.39 days' average daily volume, compared with an average of 3.47 days for the previous reporting period, according to Nasdaq.

(Reporting by Edward Krudy; Editing by Jan Paschal)


View the original article here

Middle-class falls short on pension funds

NEW YORK – Average American than recorded 7% of their retirement nest eggs desired and are likely to continue to work in retirement to supplement his income.

Middle-class Americans believe that which they need $ 300,000 to fund their retirement, but on average just saved $20,000, according to a poll released Wednesday by Wells Fargo & co.

"Middle class" is defined as those aged 30-69 with $ 40,000 to $ 100,000 or $ 25,000 to $ 100,000 in assets to invest, and those aged 25-29 with income household income or assets to invest $ 25,000 to $ 100,000.

"Too many Americans have heads in the sand to the obvious savings deficit," said Laurie Nordquist, Director of Wells Fargo institutional pension trust. "Less than a miracle, a winning lottery ticket or a large inheritance, they will be forced to dramatically reduce their lifestyle after retirement."

"Tax me, please!" Life Inc.: while Republicans are commercial showed in Washington on an agreement which preserve cuts taxes for even the very wealthy Americans, not every nation millionaire and billionaires are cheering. Your career: the lessons you can lean as these essential 12 toys for Christmas hits past Life Inc.: signs that more people are hiring

Of the retirement age approaching fast are not well funded. Respondents aged 50 to 59 recorded an average of only $29,000 for retirement.

As a result, more than a third of respondents believe that they will have to work during retirement to the things they want or ends simply.

Many are still relying on social security to fill the void, although confidence in this funding varies considerably according to age.

Sixty - seven percent of respondents aged between 50 and 59 believe that social security will contribute to their retirement income while only 22% of the 30-somethings thought that it would be enough left in the pot to fund their retirement.

The vast majority of respondents admitted that they should help determine how much money they need to live in retirement and investments to their 401 (k) s collection. But in a negative torque for financial advisors, more than two-thirds said that they were not willing to pay for these tips.

This puts more responsibility employers to provide advice and planning through their workplace 401 plans tools Nordquist says.

"If people are not willing to pay for tips that they will make an approach more vanilla planning," she says. "But a simple plan is better than no plan." (Statement by Helen Kearney, mounting by Matthew Lewis)

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.


View the original article here

Taxes offer relief in the short term, at a price plan

Consider a plan of stimulation of an important price tag.

Tax agreement between the White House and Republicans in Congress, if approved, will a little bit of extra money in your pocket for the next two years. But you will eventually pay.

Cruel or fair? Your career: it's no fun working in a hard, demanding boss. But you can use to your advantage. 12 essential Christmas Toys hits past Life Inc.: signs that more people are hiring that $400,000 get buyers everywhere in the United States

Without significant cuts in federal spending, Americans can expect an increase in taxes on the road to cover the cost of the package.

The hope is that the plan will help stimulate spending, increased demand and get business in an atmosphere of hiring.

"This is real money to people who will make a real difference in life that we sent here", Obama said to journalists during a press conference.

But the agreement does not include expenditure reductions to offset the lower tax rate expires. This means that Government will have to borrow to fund the plan.

Congress and the White House are still hammering the details. Without an agreement, adopted at the beginning of the 2000s temporary tax cuts expire this month, sending rates higher in all areas and threatening to halt an already weak economic recovery.

The size of the package will be called as details are finalized. Initial estimates put the cost of both 900 billion over two years. Here's where all this money will go:

Income tax rates
By extending the current rates in all areas, you will see no change in the basic tax you pay on earned income: these rate is high at 35%. Obama administration had wanted to leave the increase rate for wealthy taxpayers, but everyone gets in the agreement concluded with the Republicans keep pace for two years.

First thoughts: you need to know when to hold'em

Obama also insisted on the a progressive increase in the tax on capital gains but also remain the current rate of 15 per cent.

Real estate taxes
Rich taxpayers has also benefit from other provisions of the agreement. Tax Estate inherited silver eliminated completely by 2010, was scheduled to return to the taxation of estates over $ 55% 1 million 2001 levels. The proposed transaction, for the next two years, a new tax estate 35 percent will be kick in on estates over $ 5 million (10 million dollars for couples).

Contributions
Everyone will also get a break on their premiums, but wealthy taxpayers will get a break slightly better. In exchange for the abandonment of the so-called Making Work Pay tax credit, all taxpayers will get a break of 2 per cent on their contributions to social security for one year. The old, tax credit that maxxed $ 400 ($ 800 for couples), has been limited to those who have less than $95,000 (or pairs of $190,000.) Now, everyone saves 2 percent of the first instalment of $107,000 in their income. If the more you win, you save.

The White House, said the agreement will also preserve the tax on income earned for working families, a child tax credit and tax credit college credit.

Alternative minimum tax:
Middle-class taxpayers get continued protection of a perennial Monster called the alternative minimum tax. Originally intended for higher household income tax, this tax was never indexed to inflation, so he moved regularly in wide income. Of the proposed transaction, the existing "patch" UL will be extended for two years, save some 21 million middle-class taxpayers have hit with these higher rates.

Unemployment insurance:
Unemployed workers who have exhausted their benefits, the agreement would renew the additional benefits expired last week suddenly cutting checks for approximately 1.4 million people. After several rounds of these renewals are mired in politics, tax agreement would leave benefits in the long term in place for 13 months. Republicans blocked the last renewal submitted supplementary benefits should be paid to expenditure reductions. But the most recent tax agreement did not need these reductions.

Vote, discuss: is this a good compromise?

The plan is far from being one. With the federal budget deficits already executed approximately 1.3 trillion dollars per year some members of Congress are grumbling postpones accounts and make more expensive for everyone when arrives so far.

"I can understand need for additional stimulus in the short term," said Senator Mark Warner, D - Virginia and member of the Committee of the Senate. "If it is just a punt for two years, and it does lead to important reform and deficit reduction of tax, which had to be there simultaneously with this stimulus in the short term and then I have real problems (the plan)."

There are those who have doubts about how plan will stimulate the economy in the short term, especially if it adds to fears of large deficits and taxes higher within two years.

Rating agency Moody said Monday that if the tax cuts permanent, it could hurt U.S. finance and its rating of credit on the road.

"The key question is how do we get jobs going?", said David Malpass, President of Global Encima, an economic research firm. "How to obtain jobs goes is to have some plan for small businesses that enables credit, allowing some certainty in the tax code." It does. ?

Investors seem to like the plan. The stock has increased on news, based on the hope that the plan will help stimulate the economy. With impact discoloring of Government fiscal stimulus measures, FED Chairman Ben Bernanke has undertaken on another 600 billion purchase binding, called "quantitative easing," towers to pump more money into the economy. But many investors were skeptical that non-tested plan will work.

"I hope (Congress) will realize that this economy is not going anywhere until we start to get fiscal stimulus measures will," says Art Cashin, Director of financial services of UBS speaking at the New York Stock Exchange operations. "I believe that the person more relieved the nation now perhaps Bernanke because it is no longer 100% on his shoulders."

Bond investors were not very pleased with the proposed tax package: Consolidated Revenue Fund sold on concerns that the Government will have to sell the debt still more to be paid extended benefit cuts and the unemployed. Which may be more difficult to make that second round the Fed easing of the quantitative expires in June. Binding refuse buyers, then interest rates could rise.

"If the Fed go with EQ III, then came June we are going to have to finance the deficit we expected but this 500 billion additional dollars per year of this program," said James Tisch, Loews Corp. CEO.

? 2010 reprints of msnbc.com


View the original article here

Doomsayers sell short Britain, says top to top Fund Manager Tom Dobell

Mr Dobell’s scorn is quite different from the populist claptrap produced by politicians almost every day (yes, Vincent, I mean you). During a lost decade in which the FTSE 100 index of Britain’s biggest shares fell by 15pc, M&G Recovery more than doubled investors’ money.


So the opinions of its manager about who is to blame for the mess we are in and the prospects for Britain’s economic recovery – or the risks of a double-dip recession - are better informed than most. He recently celebrated his tenth anniversary at the helm of the flagship fund of M&G - the company that introduced unit trusts to Britain - and emphasises that he buys or shuns individual shares rather than backing an economy.


But this usually quietly-spoken farming man from Somerset is emphatic that the pessimists are wrong and that those who believe them are not only selling Britain short but missing major opportunities to make money.


Speaking before this week’s better-than-expected gross domestic product (GDP) figures eased fears of economic stagnation, he said: “Detractors are ten a penny and, unfortunately, a lot of people see the glass as half empty but I am pretty optimistic and believe there are great opportunities for some British companies.


“We look to identify unloved businesses with honest hard-working managers, good strategies and the cashflow that comes from that. The aim is to buy low, when they are being bashed from pillar to post, and then sell high when they have bounced back.”


A dramatic recent example of the risks and rewards of this strategy is the oil giant BP; now the fund’s biggest single holding. Mr Dobell recalled widespread panic and pessimism when BP’s share price fell by 50pc after the Gulf of Mexico disaster.


He said: “We were already investors, because we believed the company was halfway through its recovery from earlier setbacks, but we doubled our holding during the carnage when we saw some behaviour I absolutely loathe. Politicians, lawyers, hedge fund managers and many elements of the media descended on the company.


“BP took 100pc of the blame when it only owned 65pc of the assets. The management took full responsibility for a horrendous accident in which 11 people died and an environmental tragedy.


“But they got very little sympathy or support from anybody – including, I regret to say, the British Government. I had several meetings with BP’s management and took the opportunity to buy 40m shares at an average price of 363p.”


At the current price of about 426p, that’s a paper profit of nearly £25m. Not bad for a few weeks’ work but not relevant either from Mr Dobell’s point of view – or, he believes, many of his investors.


He explained: “M&G’s approach, formulated over 40 years at Recovery, is to take a long-term view and ignore short-term noise in the stock market. It’s a big advantage to have an average holding period of five years, compared to about eight months for the typical investment institution.


“I am not an economist or an accountant; I am a stock-picker. It’s very simple what I do but the power of compound investment is massive and the returns can be huge if you get it right over time.


“Our typical investor has been with M&G for about 17 years. He or she probably does not work in financial services but is doing their best for their family, trying to pay off the mortgage or bullet-proof their pension.


“We are trying to provide a savings platform for them, rather than trying to pretend we can be top of the pile all of the time. People are going to need to save more in the future and, if we do well for the customer, M&G will do well and I will get paid.”


The dangers of excessive debt and the difficult years ahead as Britain recovers from the consumer credit binge are topics on which Mr Dobell is outspoken: “I am not party political but the last administration did a lot of damage. Thank God we were relieved of their stewardship of the economy.


“Unfortunately, we had become complacent that our place in the world was assured. The mistaken idea that rising house prices and hopes of winning the lottery might be a plan for retirement are national characteristics that will have to be amended.


“The truth is we are going to have to work hard and save hard. But it was not UK Plc that went bust; it was the government finances that were in tatters because we were living beyond our means. The man in the street was also being encouraged to borrow too much and it is difficult to see how that could have been sustained.


“Now companies are already adapting more realistic financial strategies for recovery – and many members of the public are doing the same. Britain enjoys many advantages of language, technology and a stable democracy, so we will continue to have a huge amount to offer the world.”


Asked for a specific stock that represents those hopes for the future, he cites Vodafone, the global telecommunications giant which is another of Recovery’s top 10 holdings. Mr Dobell explained: “I didn’t hold any Vodafone when its share price touched £4 in March, 2000. Back then, the company represented about 8pc of the market and the pressure to hold some was massive.


“But when the telecommunications, media and technology bubble burst and the shares slipped below £1 I began to accumulate. At Vodafone’s current price of 167p, the shares are still well below half their peak value. It’s been quite a slow recovery but I believe there is a good chance that shareholders will benefit as the company participates in the digital age we are already seeing.”


All this is music to my ears, as a humble saver with a Self Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) that contains modest direct holdings of BP, Vodafone and HSBC. I tell Mr Dobell that it’s reassuring for this small investor to see that I have picked up over the years five of his giant fund’s 10 biggest holdings – the other two being GlaxoSmithKline and National Grid.


But, of course, there is much more to Recovery than that. The fund is diversified over 96 shares with a good deal of the outperformance generated at the smaller end of the FTSE All Share index of 700 funds plus some exposure to the corporate minnows of the Alternative Investment Market. Mr Dobell cites a 17-year-long holding in the former tiddler, Tullow Oil, which grew into a Footsie giant. He


invested because of “inspirational management and a terrifically talented team”, rather than rumours about the black stuff, and the stock remains a top 10 holding to this day.


That raises an important point about exposure to international growth opportunities which can be obtained from shrewd selection of shares traded in London. Mr Dobell explained: “In 1969, when Recovery was set up, 5pc of earnings came from overseas and, when I took over in 2000, about 50pc of earnings came from overseas.


“Today, it’s about 75pc to 80pc but that’s not to say British companies have given up investing in the UK. I believe that this country is still a centre of excellence in many industries and we have the advantage of a peaceful, democratic economy with an important element of shareholder power and performance disclosure rules.


“These characteristics give us a terrific role to play in the future of the world. I feel uneasy that it has become a consensus view that emerging markets are the place to look and I am sceptical about the idea that emerging markets are a panacea.


“I profoundly believe that the growth in global population from 5bn to 8bn over the next 25 years will cause great shortages of commodities, such as food and water, and this scarcity might well lead to economic and physical conflict. China’s emergence as an undemocratic superpower with a communist party system is potentially a source of grave concern.”


So, is he betting the farm on British shares bouncing back after a decade in the doldrums? He winces: “We are bottom-up stock-pickers. Betting is for the race course.”


CV
---------------------------------------


Family: Married with one son and two daughters.


Education: Writtle Agricultural College, Chelmsford, Essex.


Drives: “A 10-year-old blue jalopy. It’s a Renault Megane, I think. Not really interested in cars.”


Hobbies: Supports Somerset County Cricket Club and farms in Essex.


Favourite film or book: “Pass.”


View the original article here

Net income for the fourth quarter of Apple rise 70 pct; iPad falls short

SEATTLE - Apple Inc. said Monday that net income for the latest quarter rose by 70% on sales of the iPhone, although iPad sales fell from expectations.

Shares fell into trade after hours normales.Stock Apple had perforated top for more than a week on great hopes for the iPad record prices.

Apple sold its new computer Tablet-style to exercise 4.2 million fourth quarter, less than the approximately 5 million that analysts, on average, had planned.

The company sells iPhone 14.1 million from July to September, more than 12 million cherchaient.Apple chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer analyst said in an interview that the company was able to do more iPhone, that number would have been even higher.

The iPad sales could have been hampered by supply problems. Oppenheimer said that enterprise was able to increase production of iPad towards the end of the quarter.

Apple's net income increased by 4.3 billion dollars, or $ 4.64 per share of 2.5 billion dollars, or $2.77 per share, during the same period last year.

Stir-fry recipes 67 per cent to 20.3 billion from $ 12.2 billion last year.

Revenues and net income were record amounts for Apple.The company has also much better that Wall Street analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters prévus.Les analysts expect Apple to earn $4.08 per share of $ 18.9 billion.

"When you send the best products ever, are the results that you expect to see," said Oppenheimer.

Apple has stated that it expects to earn $4.80 per share for the quarter holiday recettes.Apple $ 23 billion is known for issuing low guidance and sailing then sur.Analystes currently seek $5.06 by share of net income $ 22.3 billion in revenue.

Shares of Apple, which is based in Cupertino, California, plunged $ 20.69, or 6.5% to $297.31 negotiating extended after the publication of the résultats.Dans ordinary session earlier, the stock rose $3.25, or 1%, $317.99.

For the fiscal year, income net of Apple jumped 14 billion dollars, or 3 p.m. $15 per share, 70 per cent of 8.2 billion from $ 9.08 or $ per share.

Stir-fry recipes 52% to $ 42.9 billion $ 65.2 billion.

Copyright 2010 the Associated rights Press.Tous réservés.Ce hardware cannot be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


View the original article here

Powered by Blogger