That stock News

New discussion on the repatriation of cash is very political. 5.25% Repatriation tax rate (job American creation Act of 2004) in 2004/5 still not sit with great, given that there was "appeared" to be no jobs or the United States capital expenditures increased created, and a case has been made that it allowed over redemption. Counter arguments which are "if they bring back they will spend it" has developed, but also to compare with the banks, "give you their money, they can not lend. Then there is the appearance of giving America a reduced much while personal rates are provided for back - tax rate which is currently countered with examples of companies spending abroad so that they do is taxed. Real economic issues, but also many of the policy.

In my opinion, given large holdings of cash (and the limited data on what exactly is abroad) and the ability to borrow a pocket to finance other short-term I should be demonstrated that money should stimulate the economy and create jobs américains.à long term, that the question of national growth verses of current tax revenue should be treated, possibly as early as next year, pursuant to a reorganization of management at the Congress.

View the original article here