That stock News

RBS has not demonstrated the FSA report and it is understood that Chief Executive Stephen Hester nor President Sir Philip Hampton saw it

Shareholders have expressed their dismay at the authority financial service (FSA) decision not to publish the report, which are exempt from any wrongdoing CSR executives.

"Decision of the FSA raises a number of serious issues." "If you compare this case with Equitable Life, it is clear that the amount of transparency given is radically different," said one of the ten main shareholders of RBS.

Angry shareholders came one day after Lord Oakeshott, Liberal Democrat spokesperson of the Treasury Board has tabled a parliamentary question requiring the FSA marks the report available to the Parliament.

UK, the organisation to occupy des participations de l'Etat, investments should discuss the report of a meeting of the Board of Directors next week, as concern grows on whitewash apparent.

RBS himself was also not shown the report and it is understood that Chief Executive Stephen Hester nor President Sir Philip Hampton saw it.

In a declaration of a page, the FSA stated that RBS failure was the result of "poor decisions", but added that he had not found any instances of "fraud or dishonest activity by senior RBS" or a failure of the part of the Commission corporate governance.

"In view of their findings, it seems seems be work immensely undistinguished." I do not understand how you might consider a bank which almost caused the collapse of the whole of the UK financial system and conclude that there is no major failure of the corporate governance, "said a sector banking source."

Johnny Cameron, the former head of commercial banks, investment of RBS remains the only member of the management received an official censorship.

The FSA is arguing that it is prevented from investigating its public CSR financial services and the Act of 2000 markets.

In article 348 of the Act on the "confidential information must not be disclosed", which supports the FSA applies to data collected by its researchers supported by PricewaterhouseCoopers staff for his report.

A sole shareholder said that he had contacted the FSA to request a copy of the report and had been postponed.

Investors have already rather than make a call to push the FSA to reverse its decision to informal discussions.

"It's amazing that they chose not to release this information that we have and taxpayers should be permanently. It is the taxpayers are the largest shareholder of RBS. "They have the right to know," said the investor.

View the original article here