Showing posts with label wrong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wrong. Show all posts

Suppression of the premium is the wrong message to the town of generators of tax

  Perhaps the Treasury should be looking to benefit as much as possible from the City, rather than deliberately suppressing tax revenues from its activities?Photo: Alamy

Take the 50pc income tax rate. In times of need, such as now, I can see why George Osborne might decide to adopt 50p in the pound as the amount of tax people should pay on earnings over £150,000.


The Treasury needs to maximise its revenues to help it balance the nation's books as quickly as possible. Speed is of the essence if the restless international capital markets are going to keep on believing that the Coalition, itself a construct with shaky foundations, is serious about fiscal consolidation. Bond markets will hold interest rates down for the Government's debts only as long as investors are sure our finances are being put back on track, and quickly.


And, of course, the more money the Chancellor can generate, the less reliant he will be on the unpopular and painful public sector cuts.


So not only is it in the Treasury's interests to maximise revenue from high earners, it's in the interests of public service unions such as Unite to make sure the Coalition's coffers are full of fat cat tax revenues to protect their members' jobs.


So maybe curbing bank bonuses is a bad idea, at least for the time being. Perhaps the Treasury should be looking to benefit as much as possible from the City, rather than deliberately suppressing tax revenues from its activities.


Pure cash bonuses are clearly not a good idea when trying to control risk taking. But reducing them to a trickle is equally counter productive for the Treasury. Cutting your nose off to spite your face. The quality of bonuses needs to improve, in terms of what sort of activity they reward, but the quantity of bonuses is not a sensible place for governments to dabble.


Financial services companies paid £53.4bn in tax in the year to March, £8bn less than the previous year but once again the single biggest contributor to the national purse. These are taxes generated from financial services sold around the world by banks, insurers and money management firms that happen to be based here. It's an activity where we punch above our weight, but instead of landing one on the competition, places such as Hong Kong, the Coalition is simply forcing us to suffer round after round of self-inflicted wounds.


View the original article here

Mitie: We were wrong to request fee of £ 10,000

请求通道在等待 00:01:00 以后答复时超时。增加传递给请求调用的超时值,或者增加绑定上的 SendTimeout 值。分配给此操作的时间可能是更长超时的一部分。
请求通道在等待 00:01:00 以后答复时超时。增加传递给请求调用的超时值,或者增加绑定上的 SendTimeout 值。分配给此操作的时间可能是更长超时的一部分。

However, it has now emerged that Mitie charged other suppliers £250 each to join “shortlists” on two national contracts this year.

Suppliers were told that Mitie had “invested heavily” in a procurement system and the cost would be recovered “through a multitude of scenarios”, including charging suppliers to bid for work.

“The £250 is a small fee, recovering a small percentage of our cost and helps support the continued running and development of that process. It is only payable by those that are shortlisted and have a real opportunity to increase their offering and revenue within Mitie Group,” the email said.

“The services on offer are to become one of a small select group of [service name] that will be used across Mitie and its client base.

“Once we have established who these suppliers are, we will be encouraging our teams and our clients to migrate over, thus opening up further opportunities.”

One supplier who received the request said: “I know it went out to a lot of companies and there would have been an awful lot of people who did pay.”

In an open letter to John Telling, Mitie’s corporate affairs director, the supplier added: “We are an SME [small and medium sized enterprise]. We fight hard for every penny we earn. We provide an exceptional service, and having paid this sum, against my intuition, we were told we would not be a supplier as we were 'not large enough’.”

Mr Telling said the company had identified two instances where suppliers had been charged fees to join shortlists but the practice had ceased in April. “It is not going to happen anywhere else,” he said.

He added the decision to charge £10,000 was “isolated” to suppliers of a company that Mitie acquired last year. “Mitie has not uncovered any other examples across our business,” he said.

Mr Telling said that Mitie’s executives were going to talk to the suppliers affected. “If we have had money from them that’s unjustifiable we will be refunding it.” Asked when it was justifiable to charge a £10,000 fee, Mr Telling said: “It’s not justifiable to ask for it.”

He added the fees were unrelated to Mitie’s talks with the Government over contract efficiency savings.

Ruby McGregor-Smith, Mitie’s chief executive, was appalled when she first heard that Mitie had charged fees, citing Mitie’s roots as a small business and its “values”.

In further revelations regarding suppliers, The Sunday Telegraph disclosed that the Cabinet Office is examining allegations that Compass Group has used an extensive rebate system that had not been disclosed to the Government.

In two instances, former suppliers had also been able to pass on the cost of the double-digit rebate to the Compass units supplying services to customers.

Compass said it was “a legacy issue” and was not part of “how we do business today”. Compass UK managing director Ian Sarson said the rebate system “was widely known”.


View the original article here

Bernstein's back (And everybody is still wrong) (AP)

Whatever happened to Richard Bernstein, Wall Street's favorite pessimist? He's an optimist now.

The former chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch built a reputation as a contrarian throughout the 2000s, the era of cheap credit. As home prices soared, Bernstein saw a bubble and told investors to abandon homebuilding stocks. When subprime mortgages started to sour, he warned of the danger to banks. His skepticism earned him the ire of stock boosters. Bernstein was thought of as the guy ready to rain on any parade.

The financial crisis changed all that. With investors now wary of stocks and market pundits looking for daily signs the sky is falling, Bernstein believes the conventional wisdom is wrong, again. The economy is stronger than you realize, he says. And the man who shunned stock markets is out telling people it's a great time to buy small-company stocks.

"The common theme today is that the U.S. stinks," he says. "But the economy is already in better shape than people think."

If you agree with Bernstein, you'll want to follow him into small companies that look cheap compared with their peers, a group investors call "small-cap value." They're the most likely to trounce other investments if the economy recovers its footing, and also the most likely to fail in a downturn. If you think the economy stinks, you'd be in the company of his old friend David Rosenberg, the former chief U.S. economist at Merrill Lynch.

It's only very recently that these two prominent investment analysts parted ways in their views about the economy. During their many years together at Merrill Lynch, both Rosenberg and Bernstein were steadfastly skeptical of the housing and stock booms.

"We were joined at the hip," says Rosenberg, who's now the chief economist at Gluskin Sheff in Toronto. Both left Merrill Lynch soon after Bank of America Corp. took it over in 2009.

Rosenberg, who remains reliably gloomy, says he's ready to turn positive on the economy whenever the time is right. With his friend and former colleague Bernstein now bullish on the U.S. economy, "I'm Wall Street's real perma-bear," he deadpans.

Unlike when he was the chief strategist at Merrill, Bernstein has money to put behind his contrarian views. The Richard Bernstein Multi-Market Equity Strategy Fund launched Oct. 12 with the backing of asset management company Eaton Vance. It's considered a "macro" fund. That means all investment decisions spring from Bernstein's overarching view of the world. Stocks are collected based on how well they fit into the big picture.

The fund's billing says it will target "overlooked areas across the global equity markets." That's no easy task as investors spent the past two years pulling cash out of the U.S. stock market and plowing it into areas long considered dicey, like emerging markets and junk bonds.

At a recent conference, a financial planner asked Bernstein: What's overlooked these days? The answer, he said, is right under your nose: small-company U.S. stocks, specifically the undervalued ones.

Bernstein says investors have shied away from them because their fate is so closely tied to the economic cycle. Most people aren't convinced the economy has regained its footing, which is why small companies have found it harder to get a loan from banks or raise capital from investors.

Bernstein tells people they should learn a lesson from organized crime, which found success by providing cash to those who couldn't get it from banks.

"They lend to where capital is scarce," he says. "As an investor, that's the way you should think. Obviously, when it comes to collecting your money it's a different story."

Bernstein's fund has yet to detail its holdings with regulators, so he can't name the companies he owns. However, you can see how it compares with his benchmark MSCI All Country World Index, which tracks global stock markets.

That index has 14 percent of its holdings in emerging markets, but Bernstein's fund has just 1 percent. Small stocks make up 1 percent of the index, but 26 percent of Bernstein's fund at the end of October.

If Bernstein's view of the economy prevails, academic studies and performance data suggest he's making the right bets. Katie Rushkewicz, a fund analyst at Morningstar, says smaller companies tend to beat other companies over the long term.

Mutual funds that target undervalued small companies have returned an average of 10 percent each year since 1995 and 8.96 percent since 2000, beating all other categories of stock funds, according to Morningstar's data.

Rosenberg, Bernstein's former colleague at Merrill, believes the economy is in for a long slog. During the depth of the financial crisis, he wrote a report arguing that Americans would spend the next few years repairing their personal finances, saving and paring their debts.

The report proved to be a remarkably clear-sighted preview of what was to come. Almost two years later, he still sees plenty of problems. The only reason the unemployment rate isn't higher than the current 9.6 percent, he says, is because many people have given up trying to find a job.

Homeowners in the U.S. haven't recovered from the housing bubble either. In the past, Americans owned a larger stake in their homes than they owed on their mortgages. That relationship reversed in 2007 and remains that way, Rosenberg says. Homeowners now have $10.5 trillion in residential mortgages and only $7 trillion in equity.

Asked what he thought of Bernstein's optimistic turn, Rosenberg says: "I love him like a brother, and if I was starting a fund I'd be saying the same thing."


View the original article here

Bailout Ireland: we did nothing wrong, maintains Dublin

Minister of the country, Dick Roche, Europe insisted on the fact that ministers do not mislead the public by refusing repeatedly that they were about to accept a bailout multi-milliards $-book of the European Union.

Day after day, last week representatives of the Government of the Ireland reiterated promises that they need not of external support to help their faltering, economy only to accept a plan rescue over the weekend.

He said the bailout become only inevitable once the price of borrowing markets became too high and said that it was necessary to help banks rather than the economy as a whole.

Mr Roche said: "there has been an extraordinary series of events .the markets have reached the point where it is not possible for us to continue to rely on markets: the numbers were too high."

"Ironically, the national situation was as we crossed in the middle of next year without addressing the markets, but the banking situation was such that extraordinary measures should be taken.

He added that last week all the "events worked at the point where it is necessary to take [bail-out]", but they did not reach this position until the end of week.

Mr Roche said: "there was no dissembling, isn't trompeur.La reality is that we always in contact with colleagues in Europe."

Ireland was forced to take the 77 billion economic pounds bail-out in an agreement aimed at saving the euro.

The United Kingdom has decided to support amounting to the equivalent of £ 300 per household because of the close commercial relationship with Dublin.

George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor described the Ireland as a "friend in need".

The support of the euro has been criticized by parliamentary Tory John Redwood, former Minister and co-Chair of the conservative policy review group on economic competitiveness, stated that the bailout was "not the problem of Britain".


View the original article here

Child benefit change sends wrong message

That creates an incalculable number of loopholes. Their closure creates endless paperwork. The result? Bag-letters and HM Revenue & customs charges. In just £ transmitters hacked to fund the snow melting kiddie for higher rates of 1.5 m. place taxpayers will award of the Royal Mail.

What do you think of this, Sir Humphrey? Thus, not much really. Here's another interpretation.Promise of our tax system reform coalition has descended a prospectus .c ' therefore only 20 July George Osborne appear with his Office tax simplification, promising reduce the "compliance burdens on businesses and individual taxpayers."

It is difficult to square that with the bureaucratic machine is created from the decision of the axe of family allowances for 44 these gain £ 000 next year - but not for a jointly couple earning more than £ 80,000.

This gap will take now for taxpayers to file annual paperwork, force the ISS to develop new tax - codes and potentially raise new grounds of marital discord with high-employees facing fines if their wives forget to tell them that they are still claiming for the kiddies .c ' is before you consider the potential of new laws on the rights of the parents separated or living separately.

Perhaps Shadow Chancellor Alan Johnson is just for a laugh with his letter to Boy George asking whether a single mother should pass a certain number of nights with a new partner before its tax status meant that she lost her enfants.Mais benefit, you get the picture.

IES makes enough errors without branching relationship advice - well what about letters that produce.

Alistair.Osborne@Telegraph.co.UK


View the original article here

Powered by Blogger